1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. According to the evidence evidence No. 1, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a special management service contract for housing redevelopment improvement projects in the neighboring apartment zone (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the following content on July 6, 201. A.

The scope of service affairs shall be entrusted with the following matters and administrative affairs and shall be examined and consulted on matters necessary for the progress of the project:

(1) 2) Affairs on behalf of the Defendant concerning the approval for establishment of a partnership and the approval for a rearrangement project (2) Affairs on behalf of the Defendant concerning (3) business feasibility review and preparation of an implementation plan for a rearrangement project; (4) Affairs on behalf of the designer and contractor concerning (5) Affairs on behalf of the applicant for a project implementation and on behalf of the applicant for a project implementation plan; (7) Review of design documents and a review of project cost change (8) other important affairs related to the project implementation.

B. All the expenses incurred in the Defendant’s employment personnel management and performance of his duties shall be borne by the Plaintiff (a loan. The Plaintiff shall lend all the expenses incurred in the project to the Defendant until the contractor is selected.

(d) The time and amount of payment of service costs shall be paid in cash pursuant to the following subparagraphs:

(1) 15 per cent (2) within 10 per cent (3) within 10 per cent within 10 per cent from the date of application for change of rearrangement zone designation, 15 per cent within 10 per cent within 10 per cent from the date of application for authorization of project implementation (5) within 10 per cent from the date of application for authorization of project implementation; 10 per cent within 10 per cent from the date of authorization of project implementation; 15 per cent within 10 per cent from the date of authorization of project implementation;

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff performed the service under the instant contract until the application for change of the rearrangement zone and the designation of the district became final and conclusive, and the Defendant’s total contract amounting to 25% of the contract amount.