1. The defendant shall pay 536,175,00 won to the plaintiff and 20% per annum from February 14, 2014 to the day of complete payment.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 23, 2006, the Defendant held a residents’ general meeting to decide on the selection of a rearrangement project operator and the case of delegation of contract, and selected the Defendant as a rearrangement project operator with the consent of 338 persons present at the meeting of 38 persons among 604 persons, including land, etc., and entered into a contract for the maintenance project as follows with the Defendant on the same day:

◎ 용역명: 춘천시, 운교동 주택 재개발 정비사업 시행에 따른 행정용역 업무대행 ◎ 용역금액: 건축연면적×평당 35,000원(부가세 별도) 제5조(업무용역의 범위)

1. Vicarious execution of affairs concerning consent to establish an association and to consent to rearrangement projects;

2. An agency for affairs concerning application for authorization to establish an association;

3. Review on feasibility and preparation of an implementation plan for a rearrangement project;

4. Support for the business to select the designer and work executor;

5. Vicarious execution of affairs concerning application for authorization for project implementation;

6. Vicarious execution concerning the formulation of plans for parcelling-out and management and disposal;

7. Review of design documents and specifications and review of details of changes in construction cost;

8. Other matters requested by a cooperative among the business affairs of a cooperative: (1) the payment period and ratio (total floor area 102,129 square meters x 35,000 won x 35,00 won) of the total service amount at the time of receipt of the designation of the first intermediate payment district at 20% of the total service amount at the time of receipt of the designation of the second intermediate payment district at the time of receipt of the designation of the second intermediate payment district. (2) 5% of the total service amount at the time of settlement of 10% through 5% of the total service amount from the establishment of the first intermediate payment district to the time of the establishment of the second intermediate payment district.

B. On May 25, 2007, pursuant to the above service contract, the Plaintiff started to receive an application for a rearrangement zone from October 19, 2007 to February 2, 2012, when performing services, such as supplementing documents required for the designation of an improvement zone, and performing such services.