2018Gohap775 Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (13 years of age)

Minor Indecent Act by Compulsion, Punishment of Sexual Crimes, etc.

Act on Special Cases concerning the Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Protection of Minors;

(2) Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Grail)

The Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse

Bans (Indecent Acts such as deceptive means) and violation of the Child Welfare Act

Sexual harassment, etc. mediating sexual harassment)

2018. Consolidated order for the attachment of 2018

Claimant

A

In order of transfer (prosecution) and Kim Goods (Trial)

Law Firm Song-dam

Attorney Shin-ho

January 9, 2019

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete the sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.

The defendant shall order the employment restriction to an institution related to children and juveniles, etc. for seven years.

Of the facts charged in this case, the claim for the attachment order of this case against the victim B and C from February 13, 2016 to February 20, 2016 is dismissed. The violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Indecent Acts such as Minors under thirteen years of age) and the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes against Victims D is dismissed.

Criminal history room)

피고인은 서울 성북구 E, 2층에 있는 'XXXX'체육관에서 아이들에게 태권도를 가르치던 사범이고, 피해자들은 모두 9세 내지 14세 사이의 미성년자들로 피고인으로부터 태권도를 배우던 제자들이다. 피고인은 어린 여자 피해자들이 규율이 엄격한 태권도를 가르치는 사범의 훈련 중 지시를 거부하거나 반항하기 어렵다는 점을 잘 알고, 이러한 지위를 이용하여 몸무게나 지방을 측정한다는 명목으로 피해자들을 추행하기로 마음먹었다.

1. Crimes against victim F;

가. 피고인은 2016. 10. 3.경부터 10. 9.경까지 사이에 위 'XXXX' 체육관의 여자탈의 실에서 태권도대회 참가를 위하여 체중을 관리한다는 명목으로 피고인이 보는 앞에서 피해자(여, 13세)로 하여금 옷을 모두 벗도록 한 다음 알몸인 상태로 체중계에 올라가 도록 하여 몸무게를 측정하고, 지방을 체크한다는 명목으로 피해자로 하여금 허리를 숙여 발목을 잡게 하는 스트레칭 자세를 취하게 한 후 계속하여 가슴이 지면에 닿도록 양손을 지면에 대고 무릎을 꿇고 엎드리는 자세(속칭 '고양이 자세', 이하 '고양이 자세'라 한다)를 취하게 한 다음 피해자의 뒤에서 피해자의 엉덩이와 성기 부위를 관찰하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed indecent acts against children and juveniles by deceptive means and force.

나. 피고인은 2016. 11. 18. 저녁 위 'XXXX'체육관에서 피해자(당시 13세)를 비롯한 태권도 선수부원들과 함께 1박 2일 합숙훈련을 하면서 취침 시간이 되자 체육관 바닥의 가운데 자신이 눕고 자신을 기준으로 양쪽으로 남녀 학생들을 분리해 취침토록 하면서 피해자에게 자신의 옆에서 잠을 자도록 지시한 다음, 피고인의 옆에 누워 잠을 자려는 피해자를 갑자기 양손으로 끌어안고 옷 속으로 손을 집어넣어 배와 가슴 부위를 주물렀다.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against children and juveniles by force.

C. The Defendant, from March 24, 2017 to March 3 and 31, 2017, committed an indecent act against a child or juvenile by committing an indecent act against the victim (at the same time, 13 years of age) in the same manner as the mentioned in the foregoing paragraph at the same place as that mentioned in the said paragraph.

라. 피고인은 2017. 8. 6. 새벽 무렵 위 'XXXX'체육관에서 피해자(당시 14세)를 비롯한 태권도 선수부원들과 함께 1박 2일 합숙훈련을 하면서 취침 시간이 되자 체육관 바닥의 가운데 자신이 눕고 자신을 기준으로 양쪽으로 남녀학생들을 분리해 취침토록 하면서 피해자에게 자신의 옆에서 잠을 자도록 지시한 다음, 갑자기 피고인의 옆에 누워 잠을 자려는 피해자의 옷을 손으로 걷어 올린 다음 피해자의 가슴을 만지고 피해자의 젖꼭지를 이빨로 깨물었다.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against children and juveniles by force.

2. Crimes against the victim B;

피고인은 ① 2016. 6, 28.경부터 7. 3.경까지 사이에 위 'XXXX' 체육관의 여자탈의실에서 제1의 가항 기재와 같은 방법으로 피해자(여, 10세)를 추행한 것을 비롯하여, ② 2016. 8. 20.경부터 8. 27.경까지 사이에 같은 장소에서 같은 방법으로 피해자(당시 10세)를 추행하고, ③ 2016. 10. 2.경부터 10. 9.경까지 사이에 같은 장소에서 같은 방법으로 피해자(당시 10세)를 추행하고, ④ 2017. 2. 11.경부터 2. 18.경까지 사이에 같은 장소에서 같은 방법으로 피해자(당시 10세)를 추행하고, ⑤ 2017. 5. 28.경부터 6. 3.경까지 사이에 같은 장소에서 같은 방법으로 피해자(당시 10세)를 추행하고, ⑥ 2017. 6. 3.경부터 6. 10.경까지 사이에 같은 장소에서 같은 방법으로 피해자(당시 10세)를 추행하고, ⑦) 2017. 6. 22.경부터 6. 29.경까지 사이에 같은 장소에서 같은 방법으로 피해자 (당시 10세 내지 11세)를 추행하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed each indecent act against minors under the age of 13 by deceptive means and force on seven occasions.

3. Crimes against victims C;

피고인은, ① 2016. 6. 28.경부터 7. 3.경까지 사이에 위 'XXXX' 체육관의 여자탈의실에서 제1의 가항 기재와 같은 방법으로 피해자(여, 11세)를 추행한 것을 비롯하여, ② 2016. 8. 20.경부터 8. 27.경까지 사이에 같은 장소에서 같은 방법으로 피해자(당시 11세)를 추행하고, ③ 2016. 10. 2.경부터 10. 9.경까지 사이에 같은 장소에서 같은 방법으로 피해자(당시 11세)를 추행하고, ④ 2017. 2. 11.경부터 2. 18.경까지 사이에 같은 장소에서 같은 방법으로 피해자(당시 12세)를 추행하고, ⑤ 2017. 5. 28.경부터 6, 3.경까지 사이에 같은 장소에서 같은 방법으로 피해자(당시 12세)를 추행하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed each indecent act against minors under the age of 13 by deceptive scheme and force over five times.

4. Crimes against victims G;

피고인은 2017, 2. 11.경부터 2. 18.경까지 사이에 위 'XXXX'체육관의 여자탈의실에서 제1의 가항 기재와 같은 방법으로 피해자(여, 12세)를 추행하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed indecent acts against minors under 13 years of age by deceptive means and force.

5. Crimes against victims F, B, C, G, and D;

피고인은 2017. 8. 5. 저녁 무렵 위 'XXXX' 체육관의 화장실에서 피해자 F(여, 14세), B(여, 11세), C(여, 12세), G(여, 13세), D(여, 12세) 모두가 알몸으로 샤워를 하는 중에 갑자기 화장실 출입문을 열고 피해자들이 샤워하는 모습을 지켜보다가 화장실 앞에서 "빨리 빨리들 샤워해라"라고 말하면서 호스를 들고 피해자들을 향해 물을 뿌렸다.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed sexual abuse such as sexual harassment that causes a sense of sexual humiliation to children.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and H;

1. Partial statement of each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Stenographic records of each victim against F, B, C, and G;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of 20 copies of field photographs, 20 Mesical photographs;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

Article 7(5) and (3) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, Article 298 of the Criminal Act, Article 7(3) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, Article 298 of the Criminal Act, Article 298 of the Criminal Act, Article 7(5) and (3) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, Article 7(5) and (3) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, Article 298 of the Criminal Act, Article 298 (a) of the Criminal Act, Article 71(1)2 and Article 17 subparag. 2 (a) of the Child Welfare Act (a crime of sexual abuse against victims F, B, C, G, and D)

1. Commercial competition;

Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act / [Punishment prescribed for the violation of the Child Welfare Act (voluntary coercion, intermediary, sexual harassment, etc. against a child) against each victim F, B, C, G, and D, and punishment for the violation of the Child Welfare Act (voluntary coercion, intermediary, intermediary, sexual harassment, etc. against a child) against the victim B with the largest criminal situation (a punishment for the violation of the Child Welfare Act against a child)]

1. Selection of punishment;

Each Imprisonment Selection

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;

Article 37 (former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 (Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes among From June 22, 2017 to June 29, 201 (Concurrent Crimes with Punishment of Indecent Acts, such as Minors, Minors, etc. who are under thirteen years of age) of the Criminal Act

1. Discretionary mitigation;

Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act

1. Order to complete programs;

Article 21(2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse

1. In full view of the following: (a) the proviso to Article 49(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (the fact that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment for a sexual crime; (b) the registration of personal information of the defendant against the defendant; (c) the completion of a sexual assault treatment program; and (d) the employment restriction order, the defendant’s age, occupation, family relationship; (d) social relationship; (e) the details and circumstances of the instant crime; (e) other benefits expected by the disclosure or notification order; and (e) the effect of preventing disclosure or notification; and (e) any adverse

1. An employment restriction order;

Article 3 of the Addenda to the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (amended by Act No. 15452, Mar. 13, 2018); Article 56(1) of the former Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (amended by Act No. 15452, Jan. 16, 2018)

Judgment on the Defendant and defense counsel's argument

1. Relevant legal principles

In determining the credibility of the statements made by the victim, etc. supporting the facts charged, the court shall evaluate the credibility of the statements, taking into account all the circumstances that make it difficult to record in the witness examination protocol, such as the appearance and attitude of the witness who is taking an oath before a judge, and the penology of the statement, and the penology of the witness who directly observe the circumstances that are difficult to record (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2008Do7917, Jan. 30, 2009). In a case where the statements made by the victims are mutually consistent and consistent with the facts charged, the court shall not reject the statements without permission, unless there is any other reliable evidence that can deem the credibility of the statements made by the victims objectively and objectively (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2012Do2631, Jun. 28, 2012).

2. Judgment on each of the crimes provided for in Articles 1-A, (c) and 2, 3, and 4 of the holding [Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes against Victims F (Indecent Acts, etc. against Fraudulent Means and B, C, and G (Indecent Acts, etc. against Minors under thirteen years of age)]

In light of the following facts and circumstances revealed by the evidence of the judgment, the facts of indecent act committed by the defendant by means of force and deceptive means on the pretext that the defendant, as a Taekwondo criminal, is measuring the body and the region by taking advantage of his superior position with the victims of his age, can be acknowledged by allowing the victims of children, juveniles, and the above victims who are under 13 years of age to reconstruct their body size in front of the defendant's protective order, and by allowing the victims of age to take a attitude of her appearance, etc.

1) The victims, after the defendant gets off the male son, let the female son leave the room, had the female son son measure her body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body body

가) 피해자 F은, '태권도장이 이사하고 난 뒤부터 체중계에서 올라가는데 옷을 다 벗게 시켰다. 옷을 다 벗게 시킨 다음 한 명씩 체중계 위에 올라가서 선다. 탈의실이 협소하긴 한데 여자애들이 적으면 3명, 많으면 5명 정도까지 밀어 넣은 다음 옷을 벗기 시작하고 체중계에 올라간다. 피고인은 탈의실 문을 열어두고 매트를 깔고 지켜보면서 체중계에 올라가라고 한다. 그 후 흔들리는 지방 체크를 한다고 제자리 뛰기를 하게 한다. 그 후 뒤를 돌아서 어깨너비로 발을 벌리고 발목에 손을 짚게 하거나 그 상태로 옆으로 돌게 하거나 고양이 자세를 시켰다. (수사기록 120, 121쪽), '피고인이 탈의실 안에서 팔 벌리고 좀 뛰어봐라, 앞에서 숙여서 발목 잡고 뒤로 돌아봐라, 옆으로 돌아보라는 식으로 하였다. 가림막 같은 것은 없고 여자애들이 다 벗고 뒤에서 모여 있으면 "다음 누구 나와" 하면 한 명씩 앞에서 나와서 체중을 재는 식으로 하였다. 피고인은 체중계가 놓인 곳 정면으로 보고 있었다. (수사기록 125, 126쪽), '체중 재자고 하고 탈의실에 들어가면 옷을 다 벗기 시작한다. 탈의실에서 다 벗고 남자애들은 내려가고 여자애들이 옷을 다 벗었을 때쯤이겠다 싶으면 문을 열어서 "한 명씩 나와"하고 체중을 쟀다. (수사기록 126쪽), '체중을 재게 했을 때 노골적인 신체 접촉은 없었는데 애들이 발목 잡고 뒤돌고 있으면 그 뒤에 엎어지듯이 해서 팔, 가슴 옆쪽이라든가 배 옆구리라든가 팔 그런 데를 주물럭거리면서 '살이 쪘네. 쪘네' 하는 정도, 뱃살 팔뚝 살, 다리 살, 허벅지살을 만져보는 정도 행위를 하였다.'라고 진술하였다(수사기록 129쪽).

나) 피해자 B은, '몸무게 잴 때는 옷 다 입고 있으면 몸무게가 더 나가니까 옷 다 벗고 재라고 해서 쟀긴 했는데 지방 체크라고 그래서 그냥 봐서는 누가 지방이 많고 누가 지방이 적은지 알 수 없으니까 손발 스트레칭 발까지 닿는 기 하고 고양이 자세도 했는데 누구는 몇 kg 유지하고 몇 kg 빼고 몇 kg 쩌야 된다는 식으로 했다.

(158 pages), 'F.I.D.', 'F.I.D., 'I.D. 158 m. m. 1 m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. .. m. m. m. .. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m. m.. m. m. m. m. m. m.. m. k.

다) 피해자 C은, '항상 7시부 끝나고 나서 남자애들 다 내려가고 여자애들만 태권도장에 남은 상태에서 그렇게 했으니까 속옷은 남기고 당연히 다 벗었다. 그런데 속옷도 벗으라고 했다. 피고인이 앞에 있어서 뒤쪽에서 줄 서고 옷 다 벗은 채로 체중을 쟀다. 몸무게를 재고 피고인에게 몸무게를 말했더니 피고인이 너는 왜 이렇게 살이 많이 쪘냐고 하면서 지방 검사한다고 내려와 보라고 하였다. 그래서 내려와 봤는데 허리 숙여서 손이 발에 닿도록 해보라고 해서 앞에 본 상태로 했는데 뭘 보더니 "됐다" 이러면서 옆으로 돌려서 서보라고 해서 돌려서 했더니 "됐다" 이러면서 딱 뒤돌아서 엉덩이가 피고인 쪽으로 가게 하도록 그렇게 돌아서 스트레칭을 했다. 그랬더니 또 고양이 자세를 해보라고 했다. "고양이 자세가 뭡니까" 했더니 "이거잖아" 하면서 시범을 보여주며 그걸 하라고 했다. (수사기록 196쪽), '어깨너비로 다리 벌리고 누워서 고양이 자세하고 엉덩이를 또 위로 들라고 한다. 그렇게 해서 고양이 자세도 하고 손발 닿는 스트레칭, 일어나서 허리 이렇게 하고, 그것도 어깨너비로 다리 벌리고 했다.', '(그 자세를 할 때) 방향이 앞에 보는 방향도 있고 옆에 보는 방향도 있는데, 그거를 다 하라고 했다. (수사기록 199, 200쪽), '뱃살 체크하고 허벅지살 체크한다고 하는데 솔직히 겨루기 대회 이런 것 나가면 그런 건 필요가 없는데 왜 하는지 모르겠다.(수사기록 200쪽), '체중 재기나 스트레칭 그런 것 할 때 몸무게에 대한 것밖에 안 말했다. "살이 저번보다 많이 쪘네" 이런 것만, 아니면 "너 되게 근육이 많네", 이런 것만, 자신한테는 살 많이 썼다는 말도 되게 수치심을 많이 느꼈다.'라고 진술하였다(수사기록 235쪽).

D) The victim G was off from only one man, as long as he or she is off, to the extent that he or she is required to check the body weight when leaving the first competition with the team of the player G, and he or she said that he or she was in front of and in the middle of the body, and she was in the middle of the body, and that he or she was in the middle of the body, and that he or she was in the middle of the body weight, and that he or she was in the middle of the body, and that he or she was in the middle of the body weight, and that he or she was in the middle of the body weight, and that he or she was in the middle of the bid.

I stated that "I first move I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am you we

2) At the time of the police investigation, the victim B was investigated by: (a) the six-years of elementary school; (b) the victim C and G was each middle school; (c) the victim F was not in the second year of middle school; or (d) the victim F was not in the upper and the actual experience at the middle school; or (c) the victim was in the process of making a statement only about the facts of his own experience at the time of the investigation; and (d) the victim was in the process of making a detailed statement according to the open questions by the counselor. The victim’s statement does not coincide with the details of the victim’s statement in full (i.e., whether the victim’s statement was committed by the victim after the victim measured his body weight) but it can be deemed that there was an individual difference in each victim’s individual experience, recognition, memory, memory, and expression; and accordingly, the victims’ credibility of the statement concerning the crime

On the other hand, the statement written by the victim B and C stated that the instant damage had occurred from June to December 2017, and the victim C made a statement that had an act to reconstruct the body weight by his body’s body body from June 2017. However, in the process of memory of the past, it cannot be deemed that an error of time was an exceptional case, and the victim B made a statement that there had been damage from around 2016, which was the fourth grade of elementary school in the process of police statements. The statement written by the victim C and B for the first time by the police was deemed to have been written only on the premise that it would be to conduct a detailed investigation in the future. Thus, the entry of the statement was somewhat different from the contents of the statement thereafter.

In addition, it is difficult to doubt the credibility of the statement made to an investigative agency.

3) After D's appearance, the victims stated D's body weight to the effect that D's body weight is clear, and D's body weight was removed from clothes, but it was opposed to D's body body. However, it is difficult to view D's statement as a circumstance to judge the credibility of the victims' statement about the facts of crime, and it seems possible that D's statement was somewhat passive at the time of investigation, considering D's attitude that D's appearance as witness in this court, D'I am in front, and between it, D'I am out of clothes, and C's body was removed from the body body of the defendant, and 'I am out of the body of the victim' and 'I am out of the body of the victim' and 'I am out of the body of the victim'. And I am out of the body of the victim, I am out of the body of the victim, and I am out of the body of the victim.

4) 피고인과 변호인은 이 사건 범행이 있은 여자탈의실은 공간이 협소하여 5명이 들어가 있는 상태에서 뜀뛰기를 하거나 고양이 자세를 취하는 것이 불가능하다고 주장한다. 그러나 피해자들도 여자탈의실 공간이 좁다는 점을 충분히 인지하고 있으면서도 한 명이 자세를 취하고 있을 동안 나머지 사람들은 최대한 밀착하여 대기하고 있었다는 취지로 일치해서 일관하여 진술하고 있고, 여자탈의실이 이 사건 범행이 물리적으로 불가능할 만큼 협소한 것으로 보이지 않는다.

5) 피해자들에 대한 범행일시는 피해자들이 제출한 태권도대회 트로피와 메달을 증거로 하여 피해자들이 참가한 대회가 있은 날부터 일주일 전까지로 특정된 것인데(수사기록 442 ~ 451쪽), 피해자들의 진술에 의하면, 피고인은 대회가 없을 때에도 체중을 관리한다는 명목으로 일주일에 2, 3회 수시로 몸무게를 재게 하였고, 특히 대회가 있을 때에는 꼭 그 전에 몸무게를 쟀다는 것이다. 피고인도 경찰에서 '대회를 준비하려면 그 전주에 2, 3차례 정도 몸무게를 측정하였고, 몸무게를 측정하는 김에 다 같이 측정을 하였다'고 진술하였고(수사기록 368쪽), 헤비급인 C에 대해서도 '대회에 참가하려면 해야 되니까 (몸무게를) 매번 측정하였다'고 진술하였다(수사기록 383쪽). 이러한 점을 종합하여 보면 피해자들이 참가한 태권도대회가 개최된 날을 기준으로 그 무렵부터 일주일 이전 무렵까지 사이인 판시 각 범행일시에 알몸으로 몸무게를 재고 고양이 자세를 하게 하는 등 추행 행위가 있었음을 인정할 수 있다.

한편, 피해자 F의 경우 2017. 2.경 태권도부가 있는 중학교로 전학 가면서 위 학교 선수부 소속으로 옮기기는 하였으나, 피해자 F은 이 법정에서 '전학을 간 이후에도 피고인이 관리를 해야 한다고 주기적으로 'XXXX 체육관으로 불렀고 그것 때문에 간 날마다 기의 체중을 쟀으며, 2017. 4. 이전까지 서울시에서 주관하는 대회에 출전한 적이 있고 위 대회를 준비하기 위해 'XXXX'체육관에서 따로 훈련한 적도 있다'고 진술하였다(증인 F에 대한 증인신문 녹취서 2쪽). 그리고 피해자 F이 전학한 이후에도 2017. 8. 5. 'XXXX'체육관의 선수부 합숙에 참여하였던 점을 고려하면, 피해자 F의 전학 이후인 2017. 3. 31. ~ 4. 9.에 개최된 태권도대회(수사기록 442쪽 참조)를 준비한다는 명목으로 판시 제1의 다항 기재 일시에 'XXXX'체육관에서 피해자 F에 대하여 알몸으로 몸무게를 재고 고양이 자세를 하게 하는 등 추행 행위가 있었음을 인정할 수 있다.

6) 이 사건 신고는 피고인이 2017. 8, 25.경 관장 J과 갈등으로 'XXXX'체육관을 그만두고 난 후 6개월 이상 지난 후인 2018. 3. 8. C의 모친 H이 한 것이다. 그런데 위 H의 법정진술, 피고인에 대한 검찰 피의자신문조서 중 일부 진술기재, 1에 대한 경찰 진술조서 기재에 의하면, 2017년 봄경 피해자 B이 무심결에 자신의 모친에게 체육관에서 피고인이 옷을 벗고 체중을 재게 한다는 이야기를 하여 B의 부모가 처음으로 문제를 제기한 바 있고, 그 후 2018. 3.경 피해자 C이 태권도장을 피고인이 있는 곳으로 옮기려고 하자 B의 모친이 H에게 피고인이 여자아이들의 체중을 알몸으로 잰다는 사실을 알리게 되면서 H이 피고인을 신고하기에 이른 것으로, 신고 경위에 달리 의심스러운 사정이 없다. H이 J이나 자신의 이익을 위하여 허위의 신고를 할 만한 이유나 동기도 없어 보인다.

7) Even though the victims were aware that they followed the Defendant even after the crime was committed by the victims, the victims seems to have measured their body weight and understood that it was necessary for the Taekwondo training or the participation in the Games while the victims measured their body weight by their body body and attitude. Therefore, such circumstance cannot be a circumstance to suspect the credibility of the victims’ statements.

3. The judgment on the criminal facts set forth in subparagraph 1-B and (d) of the holding [the crime of violating the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse against Victims];

In light of the following facts and circumstances revealed by the evidence of each judgment, since the victim's statement on the above criminal facts is reliable, the defendant can be found to have committed an indecent act against the above victim who is a child or juvenile.

1) With respect to the facts stated in paragraph 1(b) of this Act and the judgment at the investigative agency, the victim had a big physical contact at the time of accommodation, but the camp was able to do so. So, the first day, considering that the first day was directly higher, was the date of November 18, 2016 (the day of the first day of the dispatch, referring to the day of November 18, 2016), and so much inconvenience (the defendant at the time of the dormitory, referring to the twelth of the defendant). The victim sleeps a little amount of money. The victim swelved a little amount of money and tried to know well that he tried to do so. At the latest, the victim 1 was able to do so. Accordingly, he was able to see that he was able to see that he was able to swel up and she was able to see that she was able to swel up the clothes, and that she continued to swelick up.

With respect to the facts stated in the judgment of the victim 1, 3rd on the last day at the time of a dormitory (the Handphone was reported to August 5, 2017), the defendant was unable to fluor one of his parents and her parents. Even if the defendant was under the influence of alcohol, she was aware of the brupt, and she started her head as soon as possible. No one is the open space, and her face was tight. Nevertheless, the defendant continued to do so, and the defendant 1 was slick up to 3, and she was slick back to the bar, and she was slick back to the bar, and she was slick up to the bar, and she was slick up to the bar, and she was slick up to the bar, and she was slick up to the bar, and then she was slick up to the bar.

According to the above statements, the victim stated consistently the specific contents, including the detailed description that he/she is unable to make a statement without his/her own experience, and there is no reason to view it as unreasonable or contradictory in itself.

2) The Defendant and the defense counsel have made a statement different from the victim in relation to the dormitory.

C. On August 5, 2017, D, at the time of the dormitory, stated that D she sleeps from the defendant's side at the time of the dormitory on August 5, 2017, it was inconsistent with the victim's statement, and if D's statement was made, D was easily aware that D engaged in an indecent act against the victim. However, D's statement was made on August 5, 2017 at the time of the dormitory, that it was difficult for the victim to sleep on the defendant's side, and that she was in danger with other women's children, and there was no statement as argued by the defendant and the defense counsel (see, e.g., "the second step" in investigation record 328, 329, and investigation record 346). However, D's statement was made differently from the victim's statement based on the defendant, but it does not doubt the credibility of D's statement as to the victim's damage.

3) The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there was no indecent act against the victim on the grounds that the Defendant and his defense counsel had been able to see the inside of the office at the time of boarding. However, even at night, there was no office failure at night when the Defendant became aware of the victim, G, who stated that there was no office failure when the Defendant became aware of the victim, was inside the office (the investigative record 267, 268 pages), and that the crime committed on August 6, 2017, was done after H was done with the Defendant and her drinking place until 2:00 new walls.

In other words, even in a situation in which other children can see, the Defendant committed an act, such as sparing the victim, but the indecent act to a serious degree, such as Section 1-B and Section 4, in the judgment, seems to have been committed by most children after being locked and closely committed after being locked. Therefore, the credibility of the victim’s statement cannot be suspected on the ground that there is no witness.

In addition, the defendant and his defense counsel argued that the defendant and the female students were sleep in the tents at the time of the dormitory, and the female students were sleep in the tents. However, the J was unable to memory that he participated in the camp on November 18, 2016, and did not participate in the camp on August 5, 2017, and the J did not seem to have frequently participated in the camp.

4) As seen in Article 2-6 of the instant report, there seems to be no circumstance to deem that the victim had expressed a bad faith to the Defendant and had led to false damage. The victim’s visit to the Defendant, even after moving a gymnasium, merely appears to be due to the Defendant’s guidance and the human relationship in which the Defendant had been living as a player for a long time, and it does not constitute a ground to suspect the credibility of the victim’s statement.

4. Judgment on the facts constituting the crime as set forth in Article 5 of the judgment [victim F, B, C, G, and D Violation of the Child Welfare Act (victim F, B, G, and sexual harassment, etc.)]

In light of the following facts and circumstances revealed by the evidence of each judgment, the Defendant’s sexually abused act by opening a toilet door saw by the victim’s body and exposing water, etc. can be recognized.

1) The victims make a statement with the same agreement that the defendant had male children waiting outside the gymnasium, and the victims opened the door during shower and keep it as soon as possible.

A) The victim F is memoryd each time in the shower, and the defendant was sleeped while opening the door. The defendant continued to be slick, and the cleaning agent continued to be slick and slicked (121 pages). (121 pages of the investigation record), and (1) the date of all days, etc. can not be specified, and all days, etc. are unslicked at one time in the shower, and the victim F described one as "lick to be slick, etc." among the shower, and read as "lick to be slick, etc.". It is not clear that the defendant is slick, but at the last time, slick to be slick on August 5, 2017 (145 pages of the investigation record).

B) B was a cleaning agent in the valley and female son. The Defendant opened a door to show the show, and stated that the Defendant was not a pnish shampoo, so that the Defendant was not a pnish shampoo, and that the Defendant was not a pnish shampoo. The agent reported about 30 minutes, 40 minutes, 20 minutes, 30 minutes, and 30 minutes, and that the male hacks were born for 10 minutes, and the male hacks were in the train (the investigative record 172 pages).

C) C had a dormitory, which is a situation in which male and female attachment should be made, and it is a cleaning agent in the toilet, which is a door-to-door and a cleaning agent. A cleaning agent who opens a door and has been made a cleaning agent. A cleaning agent, which is so small that a toilet can break up, and in that manner, he should be promptly boomed, and “I do not go through a cleaning agent? I do not do so? I do not see why we do so?” It is why we can we see the outside, and you see the outside,” (the investigative record 196 pages).

D) G is a cleaning agent in the toilet at the time of boarding, and the defendant was also at the time of gathering a string outside and spreading water at a distance. At this time, the defendant stated that he was called as a cleaning agent soon before waiting for male patriotism (the investigative record 269, 270 pages).

마) D는 '피고인이 선수부 합숙에 같이 하라고 하여 합숙을 하게 되었는데, 계곡을 놀러 가서 남자애들이 먼저 씻고 올라와서 씻으려고 하는데 탈의실에서 옷을 벗을 줄 알았는데 그냥 그 자리에서 벗으라고 하여 "어? 뭐지?" 했는데 애들이 다 그냥 벗어서 벗었다. 피고인이 나가거나 아니면 문을 닫고 저쪽에 혼자 있을 줄 알았는데 그 자리에서 보고 있었다. 그때 씻고 있는 상황에 애들이 꺅꺅거리고 차가운 물로 씻고 있어서 난장판이어서 말할 틈도 안 났고, 애들도 스스럼없이 씻고 그러니까 "원래 이러는 거구나" 싶어서 그냥 같이 생활을 했다. 그런데 피고인이 갑자기 오더니"야, 일로 와. 내가 뿌려줄게"라고 하였다. 일단은 아무 일 없으니까 그냥 이건 그런 거구나 싶어서 씻었다. (수사기록 310쪽), '토요일에 계곡을 갔는데(수사기록 315쪽), 이때 피해자 G, C, F, B이 있었고(수사기록 316쪽), (화장실에) 들어가서 물 뿌리고 샴푸 가져오고 하다가, 피고인이 빨리빨리 씻으라고 해서 씻고 있는데, 갑자기 "야, 일로 와 봐." 이러면서 "줘봐.” 이러면서 호스로 물을 뿌려줬다.'라고 진술하였다(수사기록 317쪽).

2) 피해자 D는 피해자들 중 가장 뒤늦게 'XXXX'체육관에 다니게 되었는데, 다른 피해자들과 달리 선수부가 아니고 합숙 참가 횟수도 적어서 화장실 문을 열고 피고인이 보는 상태에서 샤워를 하는 일이 빈번하게 있었던 다른 피해자들보다 2017. 8. 5. 합숙 당시 있었던 일을 더 인상 깊게 기억하였을 것으로 보이며, 그 진술 내용도 구체적이어서 신빙성이 높다.

3) Meanwhile, the content that “the Defendant, etc. stated by the victim F,” did not appear in the statement of other victims, and the victim B stated to the effect that the victim did not engage in any act other than opening and maintaining a door outside the toilet at the time of August 5, 2017, and the victim C and G did not specifically state the days when the shower was in the camp on August 5, 2017, and there is room to view that the probative value of each individual statement of the above victims is somewhat insufficient.

However, the victims' statements are considered to be inconsistent with each other and have high probative value in light of the following: (a) the victims' statements were made in detail on August 5, 2017 when they were affiliated with the fore part of the fore part part part of the fore part part part part part of the fore part part part of the fore part part part of the fore part part of the fore part part of the fore part part of the fore part part of the fore part part part of the fore part part of the fore part part of the fore part of the fore part of the fore part of the fore part part of the fore part of the fore part of the fore part part of the fore part of the defendant

Reasons for sentencing

1. Scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment for not less than two years and six months but not more than twenty-two years and six months;

2. Scope of recommendations according to the sentencing criteria;

(a) Crimes of subparagraphs 1, 2 and 3: Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (a minor indecent act under thirteen years of age);

[Determination of Type] A sex offense subject to the age of 13 or less shall be classified into three.

[Special Aggravations] Aggravations: Crimes at Special Protection Places

[Scope of Recommendation] 6 years to 9 years (Aggravation)

B. Scope of final sentence according to the processing standards for multiple offenses;

From 6 years to 16 years of imprisonment (the upper limit of crime 1 + the upper limit of crime 2 + 1/2 + 1/3 of the upper limit of crime 3)

3. Determination of sentence;

The crime of this case is an indecent act committed by the Taekwondo Sports Center in which the defendant who is responsible for educating and protecting children, juveniles, and minor victims under the age of 13 commits an indecent act against the victims in the education place where special protection is required against the victims.

However, in light of the fact that the defendant is the first offender and has a relatively clear relationship with his family, the type and degree of a deceptive scheme by force, the attitude and degree of indecent conduct, the age, character and conduct, health conditions, the circumstances leading to the crime, the means and consequence of the crime, and other various conditions of sentencing specified in the oral argument of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment shall be determined by exceeding the lower limit of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines

Registration of Personal Information

Where a conviction of each crime in the judgment becomes final and conclusive, the defendant constitutes a person subject to registration of personal information pursuant to Article 42 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and is obligated to submit personal information to the competent agency pursuant to Article 43

The acquittal portion

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes against Victims B and C between February 13, 2016 and February 20, 2016 (Indecent Acts such as minors, etc. under the age of 13);

A. Summary of the facts charged

The Defendant, on the pretext of managing the body between February 13, 2016 and February 20, the victim B (n, 9 years of age, 11) and C (n, 11 years of age) committed an indecent act against the minor under the age of 13 by deceptive means and force by having the victim be exempted from all clothes, and by having the victim go up to the body body body, measuring the body weight, and having the victims take the body body attitude under the pretext of checking the area, and by making the victims take the body attitude under the pretext of checking the area, and by committing an indecent act by observation of the victim’s mar and sexual part after the victims, committed an indecent act against the minor under the age of 13.

B. Determination

The evidence concerning each of the facts charged in this part has the victim B and C's statements and F's statements.

그런데 피해자 B은 2016년 초등학교 4학년이 된 때부터 알몸으로 체중을 재기 시작했다는 취지로 진술하였을 뿐, 구체적인 월은 진술하지 않았고, C은 2017년 부터였다고 진술하여 시기를 잘못 진술하고 있으며, F은 'XXXX'체육관이 이사한 이후인 2016. 3. ~ 4.경부터라고 진술하였다.

In addition, considering the fact that the school year in the Korean school system has changed to three months, it is not sufficient to recognize that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone committed an indecent act by the defendant, such as making the victim B and C a body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the body of the victim, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

C. Conclusion

This part of the facts charged constitutes a case where there is no proof of criminal facts, and thus, is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act

2. A point of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes against Victims D (a minor under thirteen years of age);

A. Summary of the facts charged

피고인은 2017. 8. 6. 새벽 판시 'XXXX'체육관에서 피해자 D(여, 12세)를 비롯한 태권도 선수부원들과 함께 1박 2일 합숙훈련을 하면서 취침 시간이 되자 체육관 바닥의 가운데 자신이 눕고 자신을 기준으로 양쪽으로 남녀학생들을 분리해 취침하도록 하면서 피해자에게 자신의 옆에서 잠을 자도록 지시한 다음, "여자애들 중에 네가 제일 여자 같다"라고 말하면서 갑자기 양손으로 피해자를 끌어안고 피해자의 입술에 자신의 입을 맞추었다.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act by force against a minor under 13 years of age.

B. Determination

The evidence concerning this part of the facts charged is that the victim's police statement (Evidence No. 42) is available.

However, on August 5, 2017, the victim stated at the police station that he/she was able to kid against the Defendant, and that he/she was able to kid against the other female children (see, e.g., 328, 329, and 346 on the investigation records). When the Defendant kids and kids a kids, the victim stated that he/she was kid against the Defendant at the time when the Defendant was in the third camp that the F did not participate (see, e.g., e., 329, 330, and 346 on the investigation records). The victim stated that he/she was kid against the Defendant, and that he/she did not suffer damage on August 6, 2017, which was the date on which this part of the facts charged was charged.

In addition, the victim stated that "I am in the front side of the defendant's kis," that I am "I am" and "I am not kis kis," and that I am in the front of the defendant's boarding (I am in the investigation record 311). I stated that I kis kis kis kis kis kis in the front of the defendant's boarding, and there is only a kis kis kis kis kis kis kis in the front of the defendant's boarding, and there is no statement to the effect that I kis kis kis kis kis anywhere we do not see

In addition, the victim made a statement that "When the defendant made the statement that "I would like to make four women from among women, I would like to do so, I would like to do so," and that "I would like to do so, I would like to see that I would like to see "I would like to do so, I would like to see I would like to see I would like to do so." (No later than 312 pages of investigation records) and there was no statement that the defendant would have been aware of the victim on the new wall on August 6, 2016, and that I would like to make the above statement.

In light of these circumstances, it is insufficient to recognize that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone caused the victim to the next side of the defendant on August 6, 2016 and caused the victim to be abused by dancing with the victim's entrance, and there is no other evidence to recognize otherwise.

C. Conclusion

This part of the facts charged constitutes a case where there is no proof of criminal facts, and thus, is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure

Judgment on the request for attachment order

1. The summary of the request for attachment order;

As stated in the facts charged, a person who requests an attachment order has repeatedly committed sexual crimes against children and juveniles under 19 years of age for a long time, and is highly likely to recommit sexual crimes in full view of the defendant's occupation, criminal environment, criminal law, character and conduct, etc.

2. Determination

The risk of recidivism of a sexual crime under Article 5(1) of the Act on the Probation and Electronic Monitoring, etc. of Specific Criminal Offenders means that the possibility of recidivism is insufficient solely on the basis of the possibility of recidivism, and that there is a probable probability that the person subject to the request to attach an attachment order may injure the legal peace by committing a sexual crime again in the future. The existence of the risk of recidivism of a sexual crime ought to be objectively determined by comprehensively assessing various circumstances, such as the occupation and environment of the person subject to the request to attach an attachment order, the conduct before and after the relevant crime, the motive, means, circumstances after the crime, and circumstances after the crime (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2010Do7410, Dec. 9, 2010

In addition to the crime indicated in the judgment, the person subject to an application for an attachment order is an initial offender who has no record of punishment for a sex offense; the results of the investigation conducted before the person subject to the application for an attachment order; the Korean risk assessment level of a sex offender (K-SAS) is 15 higher than the middle; the assessment result of the pre-trial test (PCL-R) is 10 higher than the middle middle level; the person subject to the application for an attachment order orders the completion of sexual assault treatment programs and employment restrictions, etc. aimed at preventing the recidivism, along with the sentence of imprisonment, with the sentence of imprisonment, for the person subject to the application for the attachment order; thus, taking into account the following factors: (a) the fact that the person subject to the application for the attachment order could expect the effectiveness of preventing recidivism and correcting personality and behavior through the enforcement of the sentence and the incidental disposition; and (b) the character, character and environment of the person subject to the application for the attachment order, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone alone does not have any other evidence to

3. Conclusion

The request for the attachment order of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 9(4)1 of the Act on the Probation and Electronic Monitoring, etc. of Specific Criminal Offenders on the ground that the request is without merit.

The presiding judge, the Gimology judge

Judges Kim Gin-young

Judges, Senior Jins

1) Since it is necessary to partly revise the part of the facts charged in the instant case’s facts charged, the part of the facts charged without the amendment process of indictment to the extent that it does not interfere with the Defendant’s exercise of defense right, based on the facts duly admitted by the evidence duly examined by

2) Although it is described as “C”, it appears to have made an erroneous statement in light of the content of the preceding statement.