logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.03.20 2013고단6110
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

The defendant pays 2,680,000 won to the applicant for compensation.

3.2

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around April 15, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would make a work in a multilateral bank,” to the victim F who operates the “Eda” in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, to the effect that “The Defendant would make a work in a multilateral bank.”

However, even if the defendant receives the advance payment, he did not have the intention or ability to perform the work in the future.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 4 million won from the victim to the account used by the defendant on the same day.

The defendant and G conspiredd to acquire prepaid money by deceiving the multi-user to work as an employee in the 2013rd group6321.

Therefore, the Defendant and G, around March 10, 2010, received 3.3 million won from the victim who did not intend to work as an employee even if he/she received a factual advance payment from the Jda operated by the victim I in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and the Defendant and G received 3.3 million won from the victim, respectively.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with G and acquired a total of 6.6 million won from the victim.

Around October 22, 2010, the Defendant stated that “Around October 22, 2010, the Defendant would work as an employee from KDak from October 26, 2010 to KDak as a pre-paid payment,” to the victim L operating KDak at the mutual insular coffee shop near the bus terminal located in the city bus terminal located in Seosan-si.”

However, the defendant was working in different areas, and there was no intention or ability to work as an employee from the other side of the victim.

The defendant acquired 1 million won from the victim to the account in the name of M, which is the child of the defendant, in the name of the victim in advance from the victim.

The Defendant of “P” at around 19:00 around July 28, 2010, operated by the Victim O located in Gyeonggi-si N, P, Q and the Victim of “A”.

arrow