Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

[2012 Gocheon81] On February 21, 2010, the Defendant stated that “A” multiples of “D” operated by the victim C (n, e.g., the age of 55) in the Seocheon-gun, Gyeonggi-do, the Defendant would be the head of the Party from the day on which the Defendant was the first day in front of the payment.”

However, even if the defendant received the advance payment from the victim, he did not intend to work in the above multilateral bank.

As above, the Defendant got a false statement to the victim and received two million won in cash from the victim, namely, in advance, from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and defrauds the property.

[2012 high-ranking82] The Defendant conspired with E on March 12, 2010, stating that “The Victim G located in G in G in G in G in G in G in G in G in G in G in G in G in G in G in G in G in G in G in G in G in G in G in G in G in G in G in G in 100,000 won for advance payment to each person, she will go to work as from the

However, even if the defendant and E receive money as a prepaid payment from the victim, they did not intend to work at the victim's level.

As above, the Defendant received a false statement from the victim, and acquired 1 million won from the victim to the account under the name of the Defendant in the name of the same day.

[2012 fixed-term 83] The Defendant conspired with I and operated "L" on May 25, 2010 by K, a complainant in his/her own jurisdiction on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant, in collusion with I on May 25, 2010, provided that the Defendant would work 4,000,000 won as a prepaid payment from the day after the day after the day after the day after the day when he/she entered into his/her own jurisdiction without any intention or ability to work as an employee; and (b) received KRW 4,00,000 from the complainant to the Daegu Bank Account

[2012 Gocheon-si84] On January 26, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim, “The victim will be the head of a party from the day on which the victim was paid in advance, to the day on which the victim was paid in advance.”

However, in fact, the defendant only demanded a prepaid payment because of the need for living expenses, and actually mentioned above.