logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 남원지원 2014.08.19 2013고단277
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Highest 277"

1. On April 12, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “D” main points managed by the victim C in Daegu Suwon-gu, as “D, will work as an employee from the main point of view, i.e., the victim’s advance payment KRW 2 million.”

However, even if the defendant receives the advance payment from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to work as an employee of the above main office.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 1.7 million won from the victim to the deposit account in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

2. On October 19, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant shall pay 3.8 million won advance payment to the Hju store that he had worked before, and if he borrowed 3.8 million won from the Gju store, he would work as an employee.”

However, even if the defendant receives the advance payment from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to work as an employee of the above main office.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 3.8 million won from the victim to the deposit account in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

3. On October 28, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “K has reported advertisements on the intersections” to the victim in the “K” section of the “K’s operation of the victim J in Seogu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and the Defendant changed the amount of KRW 2,300,000 in advance.”

However, even if the defendant receives the advance payment from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to work as the above multiple employees.

Nevertheless, on October 30, 2010, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 2.3 million won from the victim to the deposit account in the name of the Defendant’s name.

The Defendant, on June 14, 2011, worked as a 8.6 million won employee on the face of a week from the Nda operated by the victim M in the Hanan-gun L in the Hanan-gun, Hanan-gun on June 14, 201 as a 8.6 million won employee on the face of a week.

arrow