A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

On August 29, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D that “The victim will work as an employee at the multilateral bank operated by the victim two to three days after the day of the week,” and the Defendant called “the victim on August 30, 2013, called “the amount of KRW 1 million in advance, which requires the payment of the child support to be provided to him/her,” by phoneing the victim on August 30, 2013.

However, even if the defendant receives advance payment from the victim, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to work as an employee in the multilateral bank operated by the victim.

As above, on August 29, 2013, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 5 million in total from the account opened in the name of the Defendant, and KRW 6 million in cash on August 30, 2013 from the victim.

"2014 Highest 403"

1. On February 6, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement that “The Defendant would faithfully work for the victim F in the Gda operated by the victim F, which was operated by the victim F, from the multilateral bank operated by the victim, the victim would be an employee, and thus, would change KRW 2.5 million from the prepaid bank.”

However, even if the defendant receives a prepaid payment from the victim, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to faithfully perform his/her work in the above multilateral bank operated by the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant deceiving the victim as above and received KRW 2.5 million from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant on the same day.

2. On February 16, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim in the Ida operated by the victim H in the second World War II, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Daejeon, that “The victim will work in good faith from the multilateral bank operated by the victim to the employee, which would change the amount of KRW 2 million in advance.”

However, even if the defendant receives a prepaid payment from the victim, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to faithfully perform his/her work in the above multilateral bank operated by the victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it.