1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Part of the decision of the court of first instance which has been written shall be stated in paragraph (3) of the same Article;

A. Part

A. Of the instant lawsuit, the part of the claim for the cost of household production and supply to Ulsan apartment model D, the Defendant concluded a household production and supply contract with the Plaintiff and the Defendant for the said model D apartment model D.

Even if the Plaintiff agreed to settle all claims regarding the contract for the production and supply of households to Ulsan apartment units around July 31, 2012 and around September 19, 2012, the Plaintiff asserted that the portion of the claim for the cost of the household production and supply to Ulsan apartment model units in the instant lawsuit is unlawful contrary to the non-committee special agreement.

In contrast, the Plaintiff’s evidence Nos. 6-1 and 2 (Dismissal of Liquidation) that correspond to the Plaintiff’s above assertion is insufficient to acknowledge the authenticity by only the descriptions and images of the evidence Nos. 28 and 29, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, it shall not be admitted as evidence.

In addition, there is no evidence to acknowledge the fact that the plaintiff entered into a non-product special agreement on the household production and supply contract for Ulsan D apartment.

Therefore, the defendant's defense prior to the merits is without merit.

[Nos. 4 to 11] 14 below the first instance court's decision

B. 1) First of all, we examine whether the facts of household production and supply for each model house and sample sample are recognized as claimed by the Plaintiff. A) First of all, the Plaintiff: (a) acknowledged that the Defendant’s employees L, recognized the existence of each model house of the Plaintiff’s assertion, sample sample production and supply price for the household; and (b) issued and delivered the Plaintiff a certificate No. 5.