logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.12.20 2013고단5525
장물취득
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Reasons

Criminal facts

【The Defendants, from June 2012 to June 2012, engaged in the medium-sized mobile phone sales business at the office without the trade name of the third floor of the commercial building located in Daegu-gu E, and conspired to sell and sell the medium-sized mobile phone by opening the Internet portal site, and opening the NAV in the NAV to sell and purchase the abnormal high-speed mobile phone, including theft and loss of the mobile phone.

On June 3, 2012, the Defendants promised in advance to receive the above tables from the Daegu Cargo Storage Storage Office, Daegu-dong, Daegu-dong, 329-3 through Kwikwikset Service, to receive delivery from the said tables, and acquired stolen goods by purchasing 23 smartphones worth KRW 6,100,000 in the market price of the victim's name and unclaimed box owned by G, while there is doubt that 23 smartphones owned by the victim's name and unclaimed box amounting to KRW 23,00,00 in the market price of the victim's name and unclaimed box.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to acquire stolens and acquired stolens by purchasing 223,00,000 smartphones equivalent to the market price of KRW 223,00,000 from the above G in the same way from September 8, 2012.

【2013 Highest 6064 - Defendant C’s “H” was a person who runs a business of purchasing heavy cell phones via the Internet, and on January 6, 2013, the Defendant purchased from K one middle and galthothal mobile phone base and one cellular phone base around the I University located in Daegu Suwon-gu around J convenience store.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to verify whether a person engaged in the business of purchasing heavy cell phones is stolen by taking measures, such as confirming the identity, etc. of a seller and complying with the nominal owner of the mobile phone, and confirming the source, etc. in the case of a disagreement.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and confirmed the stolen.

arrow