Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) opened a private document forgery via a copy of E’s resident registration certificate kept in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, and a mobile phone through the head of Tong (Agricultural Cooperatives) of the F Co., Ltd.; (b) stated “E”, “H”, “H”, and “E” in the name column of the new service contract; (c) stated “H” and “H” in the resident registration number column; and (d) indicated “E” in the “E”, “H”, and “J” in the customer information column of the contract for installment sale of a device; and (d) signed “E” in the customer information column of the application for the subscription to the fee system; and (e) signed “E” in the customer information column of the applicant column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged each of the service contracts, terminal installment sales contracts, and the application form for subscription to the fee rate discount system in the above E name, which are private documents on rights and obligations without authority.

2. The Defendant at the above time, at the same place, sent a forged service contract, terminal installment trading contract, and an application for fee discount as if the document was duly formed, to K, who is a D employee who knew of the forgery.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and L;

1. Application of a new service contract, a sales contract of a terminal, an application for subscription to a charge discount system, and the Acts and subordinate statutes on receipts;

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's reasons for sentencing of Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act recognizes the crime of this case.