logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.05.30 2019고단879
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 23, 2019, at around 01:00, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s business, such as obstruction of business and damage to property, and interfered with the victim’s business, such as waiting rooms managed by the victim D (60 years of age) of the victim D (60) of the victim C4 floor in Yangyang-si, Yangsan-si, and destroying and damaged the victim’s property by putting him/herself into a sloped room, lighting instruments installed at the tent and electric power distribution lines such as shocks, shocks, etc. installed at the tent, and passing a wall up to a 30-minute bhum, such as cutting down waste, taking a brush, going into a brush, going into the brightness, going out, or going out on a blap, thereby hindering the victim’s business, and destroying the victim’s property in an amount of approximately KRW 125,000,00 for repairing costs.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property to be repaired, and interfered with the victim's bathing business and management by force.

2. The Defendant assaulted the Defendant, who was under disturbance, on the ground of the date and time as indicated in paragraph (1), and at the place of the obstruction of performance of official duties, on the ground that the Defendant f (the age 26) was frightened by the police officer, who was a police officer belonging to the Yangsan Police Station Emba, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report on 112 stating that “nicker flicked with flicked with flicked with flicked with flick,” and that flicked the Defendant at once on the ground that flicked

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties on the handling of reported cases by F F, a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Photographs of the damaged area and photographs thereof;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Articles 314 (1), 366, and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and the proviso of Article 50 and Article 42 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the Probation Order.

arrow