logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1998. 5. 12. 선고 97다56020 판결
[소유권이전등기][공1998.6.15.(60),1611]
Main Issues

[1] Time of incorporation of a company under incorporation

[2] The elements for a corporation under incorporation to be subject to the rights and obligations acquired by the promoters before the corporation's substantive establishment

Summary of Judgment

[1] A company under incorporation is established only when the articles of incorporation is prepared and the promoters have subscribed at least one share of shares.

[2] The rights and duties acquired by promoters prior to the incorporation of a company in the process of incorporation are attributed to the promoters’ individual or promoters’ association according to the specific circumstances. In order to revert the rights and duties reverted to them to the company after establishment, special transfer, such as takeover or acquisition of the status of policyholders, should be required.

[Reference Provisions]

[1] Article 172 of the Commercial Act / [2] Article 172 of the Commercial Act

Reference Cases

[1] [2] Supreme Court Decision 90Nu2536 delivered on December 26, 1990 (Gong1991, 660) Supreme Court Decision 93Da50215 delivered on January 28, 1994 (Gong1994Sang, 830) / [1] Supreme Court Decision 90Nu2734 delivered on November 23, 1990 (Gong191, 254)

Plaintiff, Appellant

Gyeong-Sa Co., Ltd. (Attorney Park Jong-chul, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Defendant, Appellee

Defendant

Judgment of the lower court

Busan High Court Decision 97Na1280 delivered on November 13, 1997

Text

The appeal is dismissed. The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiff.

Reasons

We examine the grounds of appeal.

1. As to the second ground for appeal

The court below held that the plaintiff's claim in this case between the non-party who was the representative of the promoters of the plaintiff company and the defendant on October 4, 1988 on the ground that the validity of the agreement was vested in the plaintiff company. The rights and obligations acquired and borne by the promoters for the establishment of the company are attributed to the company at the same time as the incorporation of the company. However, the company in the process of incorporation is established only when the articles of incorporation was prepared and at least one share shares were acquired by the promoters. The rights and obligations acquired by the promoters prior to the establishment of the company is attributed to the individual promoters or promoters according to specific circumstances. Thus, the transfer of rights and obligations belonging to them should be done in order to belong to the company after the establishment of the company. Based on the facts established only on January 11, 1989, the plaintiff company's articles of incorporation did not have the substance of the company during the establishment of the company, and there is no special ground for rejection of the plaintiff's claim for transfer of ownership as to the non-party 1 and the non-party 2 company.

2. Regarding ground of appeal No. 1

As seen earlier, as long as it is obvious that the Plaintiff did not acquire the right under the instant agreement, it is unnecessary to determine whether the content of the agreement is a sale or acceptance of use, and thus, even if the lower court rejected the Plaintiff’s claim without determining as to it, it cannot be said that the lower court failed to render a decision, and therefore, there is no reason for

3. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed and all costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Final Young-young (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-부산고등법원 1997.11.13.선고 97나1280
본문참조조문