A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On December 28, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million for larceny, etc. at the main branch of the Chuncheon District Court on December 28, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million for larceny at the Seoul Eastern District Court on August 28, 2013, a fine of KRW 3 million for larceny at the Seoul Southern District Court on October 1, 2013, and a fine of KRW 3 million for larceny from the Sungnam Branch of the Suwon District Court on May 12, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant,

1. Around 14:00 on June 20, 2014, in a store located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, the victim D, who works for the store as an employee, puts the gap in which the victim D’s surveillance was neglected, into a bank in excess of 40,000 won in a mountain cover of approximately 40,000 won in other market prices, and one boomed a breabb in an amount equivalent to 9,000 won in a market price, which is a security guard of the above store E, in the same way.

2. At around 18:00 on July 4, 2014, at the places described in the above Paragraph 1 above, the victim E puts the gap of the victim E’s supervision over at least 38,000 won in a household room where it had one point in advance, which is equivalent to 58,000 won in the market price.

3. On July 12, 2014, around 18:30 on July 12, 2014, the victim E included a gap in the location described in the foregoing paragraph (1) in a household where it had food equivalent to the total market value of KRW 54,800 in total, including 10,480,000, 200, 200,000.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen another's property three times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of E and D;

1. Photographss of damaged articles and investigation reports (Attachment of photographs of damaged articles);

1. Habituality: The Defendant and the defense counsel have been recognized as habituality in light of the relevant criminal records, method of crime, frequency of crime, etc. as indicated in the holding, and the Defendant and the defense counsel have raised a dispute over habituality, and the Defendant have stolen goods from C and other large retailers over eight times from September 2012 to December 2013, 204.