logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.01.12 2015고단7386
절도
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 7386"

1. On October 4, 2015, around 12:10 on October 4, 2015, the Defendant stolen goods worth KRW 28,400,00 in total owned by the victim by means of inserting the gap in which the surveillance of the victim D was neglected on October 4, 2015, in light of the Home Plus C located in Incheon around 12:10 on October 4, 2015.

2. On October 4, 2015, around 12:30 on October 4, 2015, the Defendant stolen the victim’s total amount of KRW 188,120,00, by inserting in a bank, one of which is worth KRW 132,00,00 in the market value, for the following reasons: (a) the victim’s health assistive food in an amount equivalent to KRW 132,00 in the market value; (b) the two of the health assistive food in an amount of KRW 46,120 in the market value; and (c) the product in an amount of KRW 10,00 in the market value; and (d) the product in an amount of KRW 18,120 in the market value.

3. On October 30, 2015, the Defendant stolen the goods owned by the victim by inserting approximately KRW 119,800,00 in total amount of KRW 119,80,00, in a way that: (a) around October 31, 2015, in the light of EtF located in Incheon, the victim G manager of the store was negligent in monitoring the store; (b) one Boan electric shop board, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 89,00,00 in the amount of KRW 19,80,00 in the market; and (c) two factorings in the bank; and (d) one another, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 119,80 in the market price.

4. A thief around October 31, 2015: (a) around October 31, 2015, the Defendant: (b) published the gap in which the victim D’s surveillance was neglected in light of the Home Packer C located in Incheon around 17:20 on the part of October 31, 2015; (c) publicly announced the difference in which the victim D’s surveillance was insufficient, equivalent to KRW 1,600 on the market price; (d) one bonus 1 bonus 1; (e) the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 3,980 on the part of KRW 3,980 on the market price; and (e) two bread 8,800 on the part of the market price; and (e) 1 bonus 3,960 won on the part of the Si; and (e) 2,860 won on the part of the Plaintiff’s Home Packer C; and (e) at the reasonable market price of KRW 3,001,500 won on the market price.

arrow