1. The defendant's branch court of Daejeon District Court 2017Kadan2065, Daejeon District Court Da, and Daejeon District Court Da.

According to the overall purport of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 11 (including various numbers), the fact that a seizure of corporeal movables was made on May 29, 2019 (hereinafter in this case's compulsory execution) based on the executory exemplification of the written judgment of Daejeon District Court's Daejeon District Court's 2017Da2065, Daejeon District Court's Da, Daejeon District Court's 218 Ma867 (201Na8157), and the movables in the attached list (hereinafter in this case's movable property). However, since the instant movable can be acknowledged that the Plaintiff is the Plaintiff's goods purchased from January 201 to January 2015, the compulsory execution of this case should be denied.

The plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.