1. The Defendant rendered a decision on recommendations for execution with the executory power in the loans extended by Seoul Northern District Court 2014 Ghana4209.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 15, and 16 (including branch numbers) as to the cause of the claim, the defendant applied for seizure of corporeal movables on the basis of the original execution recommendation decision with executory power in the loan case No. 2014 Ghana, 44209 against Eul, and seized corporeal movables on August 8, 2019 (hereinafter “instant movable property”), and the fact that the instant movable property was the object purchased by the plaintiff from E around August 7, 2013 can be acknowledged.

Therefore, compulsory execution against the movable of this case should be denied.

2. It is so decided as per Disposition by admitting the plaintiff's claim on the ground that it is reasonable.