1. The Defendant is based on the executory exemplification of the payment order No. 118021, Seoul Southern District Court 2017, the Seoul Southern District Court 2017.

According to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 and the whole arguments, the defendant seized corporeal movables on July 12, 2017 based on the executory exemplification of payment order No. 201821, Seoul Southern District Court 2017, the Seoul Geumcheon-gu, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, and 1320, Dong 103, and the attached list No. 103 (hereinafter “instant movable”). However, since the instant movable property can be recognized as owned by the plaintiff, the compulsory execution of this case should be denied.

The plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.