1. The judgment of Daejeon District Court 2016Kadan10335 and Daejeon District Court 2017Na2302 against C.

According to the overall purport of evidence evidence Nos. 1-10 and the argument of the Defendant, the attachment of corporeal movables was made on the basis of the executory exemplification of the judgment of Daejeon District Court 2016Da10335, Daejeon District Court 2017Na2302, and on April 16, 2018, on the basis of the attached list D (hereinafter “instant movables”), which is the domicile of C, on April 16, 2018. The instant movables may be recognized as owned by the Plaintiff, who is the child of C, and the mere fact that the instant movables were kept in the domicile of 1 and 2, and the instant movables are insufficient to reverse the aforementioned recognition.

Therefore, since compulsory execution against the movables of this case should not be permitted, the plaintiff's claim is accepted due to the reasons.