logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.11.16 2016구합79632
수용보상금증액 청구의 소
Text

1. As to each of the Plaintiffs’ KRW 5,672,975 and each of the KRW 500,000 among the KRW 5,672,975 respectively, the Defendant shall from May 14, 2016 to November 11, 2016.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and public notice - Project name: D Housing Redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): Defendant - Public notice of the project: Seoul Seodaemun-gu on June 9, 2009;

B. Decision on expropriation made on March 25, 2016 by the local Land Tribunal of Seoul Special Metropolitan City: - On May 13, 2016, the date of expropriation: - Equity shares in F. F. 129m2 in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which is owned by the network A (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”; 7/129m29m2 on the network A’s ownership; hereinafter referred to as “instant equity”; - The Plaintiffs have claimed an increase in the amount of compensation only for the said portion among the compensation items; and the Plaintiffs have claimed an increase in the amount of compensation: 24,597,450 - An appraisal corporation: B/ An appraisal corporation and Alban appraisal corporation, Inc.

C. Determination by the Central Land Tribunal on September 29, 2016 - Compensation: 228,070,150 won - An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation; (a) an appraisal corporation of an appraisal corporation; (b) an appraisal corporation of a stock company; (c) an appraisal corporation of a stock company (hereinafter referred to as “appraisal”; and (d) an appraisal appraiser of an appraisal corporation; and (c) the results of the appraisal / [based on recognition] without dispute; (b) entry in Gap’s evidence 1 through 5 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply); and (c) the purport of the entire pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' assertion appraisal is unfair by evaluating the shares of this case excessively low. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay the difference with the reasonable compensation amount to the plaintiffs.

(b) as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes;

C. The instant land, which was recognized, is located near the north-dong of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, is located in the area near the north-dong of the “H History”. The main road is the main road, constituting a route shopping zone, and the latter is a house where detached houses, multi-household houses, and small-scale neighborhood living facilities are mixed.

The land in this case is accessible to vehicles, and urban bus stops on the main road.

arrow