Text
1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs the amount corresponding to the "total amount of personal fees" stated in the attached Table 1 attached hereto and each of them.
Reasons
1. Details of ruling;
(a) Business name: ① Plaintiff A, B, D, E - F Housing Project (G Housing Project (Third-party), ② Plaintiff C-F Housing Project (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “instant project,” and the said project area (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project area”) - Public notice and project operator: H (Public Notice of Business Approval, the Korea Land and Housing Corporation, the project operator: the Korea Land and Housing Corporation), public notice of the same public notice made on May 26, 2010 by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (Public Notice of Business Approval, the Korea Land and Housing Corporation, the project operator: the project operator), the J (Public Notice of Change of Project Operator: the project operator’s Local Land and Housing Corporation) public notice made on March 29, 2013 as of December 26, 2010 (Public Notice of Change of Project Operator).
B. Object and remaining land to be expropriated - Of the attached Table 1 attached hereto owned by the plaintiffs, the part with a sound marking of each relevant land shall be the remaining land of this case as follows.
(hereinafter referred to as “each land of this case”) - The remaining land: each corresponding land listed in attached Form 2 (hereinafter referred to as “the remaining land of this case”).
C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation (Plaintiff C) on May 22, 2014 and the ruling of expropriation (Plaintiff A, B, D, and E) on December 18, 2014 - The starting date of expropriation: February 10, 2015 - Compensation: The term “amount of adjudication of expropriation” in the attached Table 1.
- An appraisal corporation: (1) The Korea C&T appraisal corporation, the national appraisal corporation, the ② the Plaintiff A, B, D, and E: the Korea D&C corporation, the Korea D&C corporation, and the Korea D&C corporation.
D. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on December 18, 2014 (the Plaintiff C, B, D, and E did not raise an objection against the expropriation ruling; the same shall not apply) - Compensation: As indicated in the column for “the amount of objection” in attached Table 1.
- An appraisal corporation: an appraisal corporation, K (hereinafter, Plaintiff A, B, D, and E) with respect to the above expropriation ruling, and an appraisal corporation with respect to the Plaintiff C, the above appraisal corporation shall be referred to as “adjudication appraiser,” and the result of the appraisal shall be referred to as “the result of the appraisal of the ruling”).