1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business authorization and public notice - Housing site development project (referring to a echeon Mar. 23, 201) - A public announcement of business approval: Defendant on March 23, 201, No. 2011-98, and No. 2012-628, Sep. 21, 2012;

B. The ruling of expropriation by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on March 20, 2014 (hereinafter “adjudication of expropriation”) - Subject to expropriation: The following table is indicated as “land subject to expropriation”:

(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant lands,” and the individual land is specified only as the parcel number, and compensation for losses: The following shall be included in the list:

- Commencement date of expropriation: - An appraisal corporation on May 13, 2014 - Diplomatic appraisal corporation, Alban appraisal corporation and Alban appraisal corporation

C. The ruling by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on October 23, 2014 (hereinafter “Objection”) - Contents of the ruling: As a result of the appraisal, the amount of compensation is assessed less than the amount of compensation for loss, and the Plaintiff’s objection was dismissed.

- An appraisal corporation: an appraisal corporation that erases and one appraisal corporation;

D. The result of the appraisal entrustment to A by the appraiser A (hereinafter “court appraiser A”), and the result of the appraisal entrustment is “court appraisal” and “court supplementation appraisal”: The court appraiser calculated the compensation for the land in this case 46-3,50-6, and the same as the compensation for the land in this case, the court appraiser selected the amount of 46-6,615 square meters as the comparative standard for the land in this case where Echeon-si is the same as the expropriation ruling. In this case, the court appraiser assessed the compensation amount as stated in “court appraisal amount 1.7,000,000,000 square meters as the comparative standard for the land in 246-6,000,000,000-3 Special Power Headquarters and the 3,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000).

However, the plaintiff.