Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The Defendants in the factory room are the relationship between neighboring land and the neighboring land in which it is difficult for them to use them at ordinary times.
1) 피고인 A 피고인은 2017. 5. 31. 20:30 경 수원시 팔달구 C 앞 노상에서 운동을 하기 위해 밖으로 나가는 피해자 B(28 세, 男) 과 우연히 마주치자 평소 감정이 좋지 않았던 이유로 “ 싸우자 맞짱 뜨자.” "라고 시비를 걸며 피해자의 가슴을 몸통으로 밀치고 멱살을 수 회 잡아 흔들어 피해자의 가슴 부위를 할퀴어 폭행하였다.
2) Defendant B assaulted the victim’s chest twice in the course of setting up against the victim’s assault against the victim A (36 son, male) at the above date, time, and place.
2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and the public prosecution may not be instituted against the will specifically manifested by the victim under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.
Therefore, according to the records, the defendants can recognize the fact that the victims of the trade name have withdrawn their wish to punish after the indictment of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.