A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2016. 2. 12. 09:55 경 안산시 단원구 C 빌딩 5 층 D 주점 내에서 112 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 안산 단원 경찰서 E 파출소 소속 경위 F, 경장 G로부터 폭행 사건에 대한 조사를 받던 중, “ 니들이 뭔 데, 맞짱 한번 뜨자. 와 봐. 와 봐. 씨 발 놈들 아. 한번 할래.

I have taken a bath with a large voice, carried the chest of the said G in his hand, pushed the chest of the said G, tight the right shoulder and the left elbow, cut the chest of the said G in several times, pushed the police gate worn by the said F in his hand, pushed the chest of the said F in his hand, pushed the chest of the said F in his hand, pushed it down in several times, and assaulted the right shoulder of the said F in his hands.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties of police officers on criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H, F, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by capturing each image images;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommendations] [the grounds for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order and Order to attend a lecture] include “in the case where the degree of assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor, it shall be indicated in the column for the reasons for release of the release report as follows: “In the event that the degree of assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor, it shall be indicated that the degree of assault by the victimized police officers to the extent of harm caused by the assault by the injured police officers is minor.”

/ Where there are many public officials who have suffered damage, (1) / The defendant assaulted two police officers to interfere with their legitimate execution of duties, and the nature of the crime is not good.

In order to establish the law and order of the state and eradicate the awareness of the public authority, the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties, such as this case, need to be punished strictly.

Even in 2010, the Defendant committed a crime interfering with the performance of official duties.