logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.09.21 2016구합83907
부정당업자 제재처분 취소청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a defense contractor that produces and delivers to the Defendant various goods, such as shooting control devices, heat stoves, etc. of the vehicle prior to KK.

B. On October 2013, the Defense Agency for Technology and Quality Assurance verified the official test report, etc. submitted by the company that supplies the goods to the Defendant, and during that process, the Plaintiff confirmed that the official test report (hereinafter “instant test report”) received from the subcontractor with respect to the 10 goods as indicated in the table 1 (hereinafter “instant goods”) as indicated in the following table 1, submitted by the Plaintiff in the process of performing the contract indicated in the table 1 (hereinafter “instant contract”, and the individual contract is specified by the sequence as indicated in the table 1):

1) Table 1 208010496 ( June 9, 2008) 1208.208 K-104. 208 K-1 and 208 K-1271 ( December 4, 2008) 208 CPSA 1 1 lids for K-1 and 208 K-106 lids for 205 K-1363 (Annual rate, etc. 2010) 1. 1. 205 K-1 and 204. 205 K-1 and 204. 108. 16. 2016. 16. 204. 8. 16. 106. 16. 206.

arrow