logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2016. 10. 13. 선고 2015누7448 판결
종중은 자연발생적인 종족단체로서 특별한 조직행위가 없더라도 성립하는 것임[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Gwangju District Court-2015-Gu Partnership-1721 ( November 12, 2015)

Case Number of the previous trial

early 2015 Mine46 (22 April 22, 2015)

Title

It is established that a clan is a naturally created family organization, and there is no special organization.

Summary

A clan within its unique meaning is a naturally occurring family organization formed by descendants of a common ancestor for the purpose of protecting the graves of the ancestor, protecting the remains of the ancestor, promoting friendship among descendants, and is established by losses at the same time as the death of the ancestor, even if there is no special organization.

Related statutes

Article 88 (Definition of Transfer) of Income Tax Act

Article 162 of the Enforcement Decree of the Income Tax Act: Time of Transfer or Acquisition

Cases

Gwangju High Court 2015Nu7448 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff and appellant

○ Of species ○

Defendant, Appellant

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the first instance court

Gwangju District Court 2015Guhap11721 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Conclusion of Pleadings

2016.09.08

Imposition of Judgment

o October 13, 2016

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant shall revoke the disposition of imposition of capital gains tax of KRW 94,312,120 against the plaintiff on August 1, 2014.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

In addition to adding the following judgments, the reason for the original decision is the same as the entry of the decision of the first instance, and thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Additional determination

A. The plaintiff's assertion

Around 1960, the Plaintiff did not title trust the previous real estate to KimE, and even if the five members of the Plaintiff, even if they title trust the previous real estate to KimE before 1960, insofar as the Plaintiff could not be deemed to have had a substance as a clan at the time, the instant disposition based on the premise that the Plaintiff acquired each of the previous real estate by way of title trust was unlawful, since the Plaintiff cannot be deemed to have held the title trust with KimE, since the Plaintiff’s acquisition of each of the previous real estate in around 1960.

B. Determination

A clan within its unique meaning is a naturally occurring family organization formed by descendants of a common ancestor for the purpose of protecting the graves of the relevant vessel, protecting the remains of their specifications, promoting friendship among descendants, and that is established by descendants at the same time as the death of the relevant vessel, even if there is no special organization (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2002Da4863, May 10, 2002; 201Da64607, Jan. 10, 2013).

In full view of the overall purport of the arguments and the testimony of Gap's 3, 4, 6, 8 through 12, Eul's 2, and Eul's 2,4 through 6, and KimB's testimony, the plaintiff is a clan that is a joint organization of 00cc Kim 26, and the plaintiff's 20, including his son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's Professor's Professor's Professor'.

Indication of Real Estate

Date of receipt of registration

Date of cause of registration;

Ownership

Title holder

Previous Real Estate

○○○-si ○○ ○○ 345-1

21,421㎡

CC Kim

April 10, 1928

April 4, 1928

D Kim D Kim

on July 1, 1971

February 2, 1948

KimE

June 10, 1994

on October 30, 1974

Plaintiff

Busan 678-2 Forest Land 4,661 square meters

CC Kim

on July 27, 1971

may 3, 1947

KimE

June 10, 1994

on October 20, 1974

Plaintiff

Busan 345-2 Forest Land of 793 square meters in the same Ri

CC Kim

April 10, 1928

April 4, 1928

D Kim D Kim

on July 27, 1971

February 2, 1946

KimE

June 10, 1994

October 25, 1974

Plaintiff

Other real estate

2123m28,873m2

April 21, 1939

April 20, 1940

FF Kim

KimE

December 31, 1994

December 5, 1976

Plaintiff

2,089 square meters per annum 2379 square meters

may 4, 1950

on June 20, 1948

FF Kim

KimE

December 31, 1994

December 30, 1975

Plaintiff

678-2 Before 10,046 square meters in the same Rio 678-2

(At present, 2435-1, 2435-3)

on March 26, 1928

CC Kim

March 17, 1995

on December 20, 1974

Plaintiff

The same Ri 345-3 10,258 square meters

(At present, 2420-1)

April 10, 1928

April 4, 1928

CC Kim

D Kim D Kim

March 24, 1995

February 10, 1970

Plaintiff

In light of the above facts, the plaintiff asserted that the previous trial procedure for the disposition of this case and the first instance court held the GimE under title trust for the former real estate, the plaintiff acquired each of the previous real estate and held the title trust for the members of the clan in around 1960, and had the substance of the clan. Thus, the plaintiff's assertion on the different premise is without merit.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just and it is so dismissed as it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow