The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 18, 2015, at around 15:50 to 16:30, the Defendant: (a) attended an assembly of “D” meeting with 10,000 visitors from Jung-gu, Seoul to C; (b) from around 16:30 on the same day, the Defendant occupied 6,00 participants of the assembly and moved into a luminous square with the front line in the solar parallel; (c) moved along with the front line with the front line in the front line in the front line of the broad language, along with the front line in the front line of the meeting; (d) moved along the front line in the front line of the broad language with the participants in the assembly convened with the 18:40 on the same day to 20:30 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the traffic of the vehicle by occupying the front line in the front line of the broad language.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with the above participants in the assembly and interfered with the traffic by land.

2. The Defendant did not comply with the order of dissolution, even though the chief of the police station requested voluntary dispersion on the ground that he did not comply with the demand for dispersion, even though he did not comply with the demand for voluntary dispersion, even though he did not comply with the demand for voluntary dispersion, even though he did not comply with the demand for voluntary dispersion, in the case where some participants were present at D, with the number of participants 6,00 prior to the assembly in the position of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the same day, with the number of lanes 6,00.

Therefore, even though the director of the security division issued the first dispersion order in around 19:20 on the same day, the second dispersion order in around 19:27 on the same day, the third dispersion order in around 19:37 on the same day, the fourth dispersion order in around 19:54 on the same day, and the fourth dispersion order in around 20:12 on the same day, the defendant did not immediately dissolve.

Accordingly, the Defendant refused to comply with the legitimate dispersion order by the head of the police station.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement protocol by the police for E;

1. Photographs materials and photographs (the current status near the place of arrest) (the defendant's defense counsel is the defendant's defense counsel, and the defendant has not recruited any act interfering with traffic as a simple participant in the meeting of this case.