Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. In general, the Defendant: (a) occupied the lane prior to the luminous short circuit, along with the participants in the assembly of “C”, which was gathered as a optical sign square from B 18:40 to 21:00; and (b) obstructed the traffic of the vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with the above participants in the assembly and interfered with the traffic by land.

2. On the same day as the above 19:00 day, the Defendant was present at C with more than 6,00 participants prior to the conference conference in the position of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, with more than 6,000 conference participants, and the Defendant was present at C. A part of the participants was able to get wire ropes on police buses or to attach a glass for police buses. On the other hand, the Defendant requested voluntary dispersion by the chief of the police station guard division who was authorized by the chief of the police station on the ground of non-reported assemblies, but the participants, such as the Defendant, etc. did not comply with the demand for voluntary dispersion.

Therefore, even though the director of the relevant security division issued the first dispersion order in around 19:20 on the same day, the second dispersion order in around 19:27 on the same day, the third dispersion order in around 19:37 on the same day, the fourth dispersion order in around 19:54 on the same day, the fourth dispersion order in around 20:12 on the same day, the fiveth dispersion order in around 20:41 on the same day, and the sixth dispersion order in around 20:41 on the same day, the Defendant

Accordingly, the Defendant refused to comply with the legitimate dispersion order by the head of the police station.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Each investigation report (the defendant asserts that there was no intention or public offering of general traffic obstruction, and that there was no fact that the order of dispersion by the chief of the guard division was issued.

However, at the time when the defendant was arrested as an offender in the act of committing an offense, the defendant was committing an act of smugglinging the police officers on the booms of many participants in assemblies occupying the road, and the dispersion order of the chief of the guard division in the surrounding area spreads in the broadcast vehicle. Considering such defendant's act and the place of arrest, etc., the order of dispersion by the chief of the guard division has been spread in the broadcast vehicle.