1. Defendant C’s KRW 9,362,00 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from January 13, 2016 to April 18, 2019.

Facts of recognition

The Plaintiff and Defendant B were legally married.

In November 2012, Defendant B requested Defendant C to compulsorily transfer the Plaintiff to a mental hospital.

Defendant C, at around 11:00 on November 16, 2012, led the Plaintiff to the second floor parking lot of an apartment unit located in Kimhae-si, where an emergency vehicle is parked, and attached the Plaintiff to the vehicle, while the Plaintiff was unable to move properly.

The plaintiff spawn this, spawn a steel rail, spawn his body in the gap of a rail, spawn his body in the difference of a rail, and spawn from the above apartment-story parking lot.

As a result, the Defendants attempted to arrest the Plaintiff, but were limited to attempted attempts, and in the process, they suffered injury to the Plaintiff, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

(hereinafter “instant illegal act.” The Plaintiff received hospital treatment for approximately approximately a week, from December 10, 2012 to December 19, 2012, and received hospital treatment as the base and tension of the other lubow cule clusium, and other parts of lubow clusium, and received hospital treatment as the left-hand base from January 14, 2013 to January 22, 2013.

As a result of the crime of injury resulting from arrest and injury by the tort of this case, the defendant B was sentenced to 2 years of suspended sentence in August of imprisonment, the defendant C was sentenced to 2 years of suspended sentence in June of imprisonment (the Changwon District Court 2013Ma41), and the above judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

On January 20, 2015, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the left-hand fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral, the left-hand fluoral fluoral fluoral, the left-hand fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral flus

[Ground of recognition] The plaintiff's assertion of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 7 and the purport of the whole pleadings is the treatment of injury suffered in the course of escape due to the tort of this case, and this case.