1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On October 28, 2004, the Plaintiff entered the Army and discharged on October 27, 2006.

The plaintiff was in the state of knee knee knee knee while carrying during FTC breadth training around October 2005.

‘고 주장하면서 좌측 무릎을 신청상이로 하여 2006. 11. 20. 피고에게 국가유공자 등록신청을 하였다. 원고는 2007. 8 . 20. 피고로부터 ’좌 슬관절 전방십자인대 신전 및 혈관절증(변연절제술 후 상태) 및 (의증) 내측반월상 연골 파열‘에 대해 국가유공자 요건에 해당한다는 판정을 받았으나, 그 후 실시된 상이등급구분 신체검사에서 상이등급 기준에 미달한다는 판정을 받았다. 원고는 ‘2005. 1. 초경 혹한기 야외동계훈력간 장비 및 물자 운반 중 빙판길에서 미끄러지면서 무릎을 삐끗했다’고 주장하면서 좌측 무릎을 신청상이로 하여 2015. 6. 1. 피고에게 재확인신체검사를 신청하였다.

On March 25, 2016, the Defendant rendered a disposition that the Plaintiff did not meet the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State (or persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State), but does not meet the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State (or persons who have sustained injury in the line of duty), and that the Defendant does not meet all the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State (or persons who have rendered distinguished services to the Republic of Korea) and for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the left-hand kne-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-fe-greg

(2) The Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission on April 12, 2016, against the disposition of this case, against a person who rendered distinguished services to the State or a person eligible for veteran’s compensation, due to damage to the left-hand knee market (hereinafter “instant disposition”). However, the Plaintiff was dismissed on September 6, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] The plaintiff's assertion that the disposition of this case in this case is legitimate, as a whole, is written in Gap's Nos. 1, 2, 5, 6, Eul's Nos. 1 and 2 (including No. 1 and 2).