logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.09.25 2020구단2285
추가상병불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

가. 원고는 B 주식회사 남인천총판 소속 근로자로 근무하던 중 2019. 3. 22. 11:50경 트럭 적재함에서 내려오다가 삐끗하여 좌측 무릎을 다치는 사고를 당하였다

(hereinafter referred to as “first accident”). (b)

On March 27, 2019, the Plaintiff was approved for the first medical care of the “infectional dynasium on the side of the visvise, synasium,” which occurred from the Defendant on March 27, 2019.

5. 2. The “the cross-frequency on the part of the side side in the direction of the unit” was approved as an additional injury, but the “the cross-frequency on the part of the side side of the unit” was issued an additional non-approval disposition on the ground that it is difficult to recognize a proximate causal relation with the initial accident because it was an individual surgical surgical surgical surgical surgical sarrosis.

C. On May 8, 2019, the Plaintiff received from C Hospital on May 8, 2019, an anti-sorromatic diversical dysical dysical dysical dysical dysical dysical dysical dysical dysical dysical dysical d.

On January 15, 2020, at around 16:30 on January 15, 2020, the Plaintiff complained of suffering on the left-hand knee, while carrying out a program for strengthening working ability under the direction of medical practitioners E in the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation D Hospital.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). E.

On February 5, 2020, the Plaintiff diagnosed “the tear in the left side” from the main body of the Korea Workers’ Compensation & Welfare Hospital D Hospital, and applied for additional injury and disease.

F. On March 17, 2020, the Defendant rejected the instant injury and disease on the ground that the instant injury and disease does not meet the requirements for recognition of additional injury and disease according to the following opinions of the advisory opinions from the Defendant.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). ① Compared with the MRI ( April 2019 and January 2020), the injury or disease resulting from the additional application is deemed to be the aggravation of the existing injury or disease resulting from the aggravation of the injury or disease resulting from the non-approval. ② Advice 2: Data submitted on April 16, 2019;

5.8. Scenic photographys;

5. 11. Review of the RoI and on January 30, 2020, such as the RoI’s photograph.

arrow