logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.07.26 2013고합327
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendant

A A Fines 4,00,000 won, Defendant B’s fine 2,000,000 won, and Defendant C’s fine 2,00,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the executive advisory members of the Central Party E in the preceding E, the executive secretary of the Busan City Party in the preceding F, the chairperson of the former Seo-gu Women's Council, and the chairperson of the North-gu Women's Council in the preceding F.

No one shall make, or have another person make contributions to, a candidate (including a person who intends to become a candidate) in connection with an election.

Nevertheless, in order to enhance the support rate of G's competition that was started from August 25, 2012 to Defendant B and Defendant C, Defendant A collected from the first instance trial meals and asked Defendant C to raise the support rate of G's competition that was registered as a candidate in the F party competition that began.

Defendant

B and Defendant C, upon Defendant A’s request, contact with 28 persons, including 10 residents of H apartment complex B and Defendant C, including 10 residents of H apartment complex B, and 31 persons, including the Defendants, were gathered in the K cafeteria located in Busan Northern-gu J around 12:00 on August 28, 2012.

In addition, Defendant B and Defendant C made a statement to the participants of the above gathering who provide meals at the same time at the time upon request for support so that G No. 2 of the competition candidate No. 2 can be elected as F Party candidate at the F Party candidate in the competition voting at the F Party candidate scheduled to take September 7, 2012. Defendant A calculated 14:49 on the same day at the same place as I and other H apartment 2 complex residents at the same time, 193,548 won for meal expenses.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to make contributions by providing ten persons, such as I, with food of 193,548 won, such as a living conference, for the purpose of G to be a candidate for the election.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Some statements made by the Defendants in each prosecutor's interrogation protocol

1. Each police statement given to L, M, N,O, P, Q, I, R, T, U, V, X,Y, Z, AA, AB, AC, AE, AE, AF, AH, and AI;

1. A written statement of I, R andO;

1. Investigation report (No. 73 No. 53 of the evidence list);

1. On-site photographs and data on the details of mobile phone calls sent by participants;

1. Sales slips, details of supply, and copies of sales slips;

1. K cafeteria.

arrow