1. The Defendants are cement cement H and I on the respective shares in the separate sheet of inheritance shares against the Plaintiffs.

In full view of the overall purport of the pleadings in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 4, the plaintiff A owns 25893/5065 shares among H 2,491 square meters in Chuncheon-si H, and the plaintiff B religious organization Cridge owned 866 square meters in I, 866 square meters (hereinafter collectively referred to as "each of the above lands"), the network J (Death on July 5, 2005, hereinafter referred to as "the deceased") and the heir's share in the compulsory auction procedure on September 22, 200, each of the above lands of this case is recognized that the heir completed the registration of ownership transfer of the deceased's share in the compulsory auction procedure after having acquired the share in the inheritance of each of the above buildings from the heir during the compulsory auction procedure.

According to the above facts, since the existence of each of the buildings of this case on each of the building sites of this case, the plaintiffs are likely to interfere with the exercise of their respective ownership. Thus, the defendants, the inheritors of the deceased, do not assert that they have a legitimate title to possess the land, the plaintiff B religious organization C, which seeks removal and delivery of the land as the owner of the land of 866m2 in Chuncheon City, and the plaintiff A, who seeks removal and delivery of the land based on the act of preserving the jointly-owned property, is the co-owner of the association of religious organization B and the H 2,491m2 in Chuncheon City, Chuncheon-si, and is obligated to remove each of the buildings of this case and deliver each of the parts

Therefore, we decide to accept the plaintiff's claim and it is so decided as per Disposition.