The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff, including the part arising from participation.

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff is a corporation established for the purpose of workplace skill development training business under the Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers (hereinafter “Vocational Skills Development Act”).

The defendant is an institution that conducts the certification and evaluation of workplace skill development training facilities, etc. pursuant to subparagraph 2 of Article 7-2 and Article 53 of the Vocational Skills Development Act, and the defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant's defendant (hereinafter referred to as "participating") is an educational foundation entrusted with the certification and evaluation of workplace skill development training facilities, etc. by the defendant pursuant to each of the above regulations and Article 52-2 of the Vocational Skills Development Act, Article 52 (4) of the former Enforcement Decree of the Vocational Skills Development Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 31079, Sep. 29, 2020); the former Regulations on the Quality Control of Workplace Skill Development (amended by Presidential Decree No. 2020-65, Jan. 31, 202

On November 30, 2018, an intervenor published a notice of a plan for the certification evaluation of vocational skills development training institutions on the job skills development information network (hereinafter referred to as “HD-Net”) and on the job skills review board, and posted a notice of the presentation on December 31, 2018.

From February 7, 2019 to February 21, 2019, an intervenor received the application and documents for the certification evaluation of the Plaintiff and other training institutions through HRD-Net, and the Plaintiff applied for the certification evaluation of the Intervenor.

The intervenor conducted the certification evaluation of the plaintiff, and the defendant around March 2019 judged that the plaintiff was inappropriate based on the evaluation results of the total of 41 points following the above evaluation (one reduction point for one corrective order and 40 points for four delayed payment of wages). Around that time, the plaintiff posted the results of the above determination in the vocational ability development information network (HRD-Net).

(hereinafter “instant disposition.” The Plaintiff filed an objection on March 2019, but the Intervenor, on April 12, 2019, did not recognize the Plaintiff’s objection.