1. The revocation of the designation of the workplace skill development training establishment that the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiff on August 20, 2015 is revoked.

2...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 24, 2013, the Plaintiff’s location from the Defendant as “B shopping mall of Changwon-si’s window B” (hereinafter “B shopping mall”) and the type of occupation as “medical field-medical assistance and service field-other services” (hereinafter “Vocational Skills Development Act”) and as “the Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers” (hereinafter “Vocational Skills Development Act”).

(B) On February 13, 2012, the date of initial designation) was designated as a vocational skills development training establishment (the date of initial designation: February 13, 2012). (b) As a result of the Plaintiff’s regular inspection, the Defendant confirmed that the location of the principal office of the Plaintiff’s registry (Songsan-gu) is different from the location at the time of designation of the vocational skills development training establishment; (c) the Plaintiff’s director D was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment; and (d) on April 3, 2015, he/she took measures to ensure that the location of the Plaintiff’s principal office and the location at the time of designation of the vocational skills development training establishment; and (d) for D, three months (from April 4, 2015 to July 3, 2015).”

(C) On August 21, 2015, the Defendant, following the prior notice of disposition and hearing procedures, issued against the Plaintiff on August 21, 2015, on the ground that “the principal office of the Plaintiff is different from the location at the time of designation of vocational skills development training facilities, and there was a person disqualified from among the Plaintiff’s executives, and the Plaintiff failed to comply with the instant corrective order.”

() Pursuant to Article 25-2 and attached Table 1, the instant disposition was issued to revoke the designation of a vocational skills development training establishment for the Plaintiff as of August 20, 2015. [The fact that there is no ground for recognition, Gap evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 9, Eul evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 12, 13, and 20 each statement, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful.