logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2020.03.18 2019고단1271
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A’s joint crime committed by the Defendants is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name “D” from Seosan City C and 2, and Defendant B is a person who serves as the head of the said business establishment.

The Defendants conspired to employ foreign women as employees and operate commercial sex acts in order to arrange commercial sex acts by deciding in advance that they receive KRW 130,000,000,000 from sexual Nam and distribute the remaining amount to the female employees, public relations employees, etc., and ordering female employees to find the business place, and Defendant B was willing to receive money from sexual male descendants and sexual intercourse. Defendant B was willing to arrange commercial sex acts by allowing female employees to enter the room, etc.

According to the above conspiracy, the Defendants had female employees E, etc. engage in sexual intercourse with their descendants in the name of the business from June 10, 2019 to July 4, 2019, thereby gaining a total of KRW 3.3.6 million.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to commit acts such as arranging sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. The defendant A shall not employ any foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while operating “D” as above, employed the F of the Thailand nationality that did not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities on June 10, 2019, G of the Thailand nationality that did not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities on June 11, 2019, E of the Thailand nationality that did not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities on June 13, 2019, and H of the Thailand nationality that did not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities on July 1, 2019.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. The police statement of the F, G, E, and H;

1. A written statement of I;

1. A real estate lease contract;

1. Records of seizure; and

arrow