logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.02.19 2019고단3727 (1)
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

20 million won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2019 Highest 3727"

1. From early April 2018, the Defendant is a business proprietor operating a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name “C” in the first floor of the building B in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and D, E, and F are offices managing female employees and customers at the said business establishment.

Defendant, D, E, and F, according to their roles, received 6 to 120,00 won in accordance with the course of commercial sex acts from female employees G (G, female, 25 years old), H (H, 25 years old), H (H, 25 years old), I (I, female, and 30 years old), and I (I, female, and 30 years old) had them have sexual intercourse with the above male guests, who were employed in advance by receiving 6 to 120,000 won in accordance with the course of commercial sex acts from the average of 10,00 per day, which was found in the above business establishment from October 2018 to November 21, 2018.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with D, E, and F, assisted commercial sex acts.

"2019 Highest 5650"

2. From the beginning of March 2019 to the beginning of the same month from March 18, 2019, the Defendant operated an officetel K located in the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan CityJ, and operated a commercial sex business establishment with the trade name of “L” after renting the said officetel, the Defendant reported the advertisement of the Internet sex trade, and had a large number of unspecified male customers, who found the place, receive 8 to 130,000 won for each course as the price for the sexual sex trade, and had the said male guests, a female employee, etc., who had employed in advance, do sexual intercourse with the said male customers.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

3. Although no person is employed by a foreigner who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment in the Republic of Korea, the Defendant, from March 1, 2019 to March 18, 2019, provided that the Defendant paid a certain amount of allowance to the above M of the mother’s nationality that did not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment in the “LL” sexual traffic business establishment as indicated in paragraph (2) and employed as an employee of the said business establishment so that he/she is engaged in sexual traffic business as above.

In this respect.

arrow