logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2020.06.19 2020고단996
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business with the trade name “C” in the Guri-si B.

1. From August 23, 2019 to October 22, 2019, the Defendant: (a) had facilities such as four rooms, three waiting rooms, three shower rooms, and shower rooms at the above establishment from around August 23, 2019 to October 32, 2019; (b) received KRW 60,00 won from many unspecified male customers who found such facilities in return for sexual traffic; and (c) arranged D, E, F, G, H, etc., who are female employees of Thailand’s nationality, to have sexual intercourse with the above male customers.

Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. No person who violates the Immigration Control Act shall employ any foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities;

The Defendant: (a) at the foregoing business establishment, the status of stay in Thailand’s nationality that did not have the status of stay eligible for job-seeking activities from October 1, 2019 to October 24, 2019; (b) the status of stay in Thailand’s nationality that did not have the status of stay eligible for job-seeking activities from October 1, 2019 to October 24, 2019; (c) the status of stay in Thailand’s nationality that did not have the status of stay eligible for job-seeking activities from October 20, 2019 to October 24, 2019; and (d) the status of stay in Thailand’s nationality that did not have the status of stay eligible for job-seeking activities from October 20 to October 24, 2019 to October 24, 2019; and (e) the status of stay from September 20, 2019 to October 4, 2019.

Accordingly, the defendant employed foreigners who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Copies of each police interrogation protocol (Interpretation) of H, E, F, G, or D;

1. A copy of the protocol of suspect examination of the police officer;

1. Written Statement;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Investigation report (to attach five alien identification information, including suspects D, etc. who violate the Immigration Control Act);

1. Investigation reports (Calculation of profits from the sexual traffic);

arrow