A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 26, 2014, the Defendant, at the Daegu-dong, Daegu-dong, Daegu-dong bus terminal, Daegu-dong, Daegu-dong, and Daegu-dong, prepared a reply stating that “D” is “D. The detailed content is the liquor tax,” and then purchased at KRW 1,200,000,000, and acquired stolen goods despite being aware of the fact that the instant net gold-holding owned by the Victim F, the mother who was his thefted from E (21) who had contact therewith, was the victim F, from E (21).

2. On April 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) purchased KRW 2.1 million and acquired stolen goods with knowledge of the fact that the Defendant was a victim I, a parent, who was a son, who was a son, who was a son, who was a son, and a 10-year net gold (50,000 won), and a 10-year net gold sheet (50,000 won) owned by the Victim J, at the Defendant’s residence in Daegu-gu G and 401; and (b) obtained stolen goods from H (the age of 16) by means similar

3. On May 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) purchased 1 million won in cash and acquired stolen goods with knowledge of the fact that she was the victim I, 2 Damond Hamond Hamond Habbbb, 1 lubb, 1 gold brug (18K), 1 gold brub (18K), brub, and 2 gold brub, etc., which had been contacted by the Defendant at the place similar to the above paragraph (1) in a manner similar to the above paragraph (2).

4. On May 10, 2015, the Defendant purchased the stolen goods in cash at KRW 8.30,000,000, even though he/she knew that the Defendant was a stolen goods owned by KK (19 years of age) holding the victim’s name and in the name of the victim, he/she acquired from KK (19 years of age) who had contacted the Defendant on the street in front of the Daegu-gu Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, in a manner similar to the above paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police against K;

1. Each police statement to J, H and E;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. Application of each investigation report (Evidence Nos. 4-8, 14) statute

1. Article 362 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 362 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts and the selection of punishment;