beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.
However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant A.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant AD, E, F, G, H, and I do not have the ability to change credit rating by manipulating the credit information, etc. of victims, and do not have the intent or ability to permit the loan to be made or to cancel the loan executed by exercising influence over the lending company, Defendant AD, E, F, H, and I, however, call the victims who need the loan to the victims who need the loan to obtain the loan by manipulating credit information, such as deletion of credit information inquiry records, and the amount of the loan is 20% of the loan that will be obtained by manipulating the credit information. If the fee is not paid, Defendant AD, E, F
“Along with the purpose that “the money was acquired by fraud,” there was a public offering to acquire money under the name of commission.
Accordingly, E is a general book operating seven offices for the above crime of fraud, and D, H, and G is a primary team for the selection of persons wishing to borrow a loan. E, E, and F is a secondary team for the management of telephone inducements by the above means to the victims who wish to borrow a loan based on data bees organized at the first team, and I shared the role of J and the Defendant to withdraw the fee received from the victims. On January 2013, 201, J and the Defendant extended a loan by the phone from the “K” to the “K,” which is the cause of the organization of the scambling in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.
Monthly wage shall be KRW 1.2 million.
“After receiving a proposal to the effect that “L agency,” and accepting it, the Plaintiff, etc., as well as M, etc., conspired with “L agency,” under the name of “L agency,” and, even with knowledge of the fact that the telephone fraud, which was the crime of “Ssing”, was committed by “K,” thereby raising the credit rating, thereby causing the loan to vary by 20% of the loan at the cost of computer work, thereby leading the victim to play a role of telephone inducement.
In accordance with the above public offering, the telephone incentive role is assigned.