Seoul High Court 2008Nu21128 (209.04.07)

Seoul Administrative Court 2008Guhap2385 ( October 27, 2008)

Whether it constitutes a false tax invoice concerning the purchase of gold bullion

It is reasonable to view that there was a real transaction in view of the fact that there was a suspicion of processed sales at the time of the investigation by the gold bullion company and the fact that the plaintiff did not investigate the plaintiff, and that the cash transaction is merely 1/3 of the total transaction amount.

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

The appeal shall be dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the defendant.

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal on the grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds stipulated in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per