A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as the owner of the studio building in Heung-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju, sought to remodel a coffee shop by obtaining a loan by taking the studio building as collateral, but it was impossible to receive a loan because the rate of deposit money for lease on a deposit basis or for lease on a deposit basis established in the studio building is high, the Defendant believed to obtain a loan by forging a real estate lease contract or a lease contract in order to obtain a loan as if it was less than the actual deposit.

1. On October 23, 2012, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) at the Defendant’s office located in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si; (b) stated in the column for deposit for the real estate lease contract under 101 of the above studio 10 million won; (c) stated in the lessee column as “Cheongju-gu E building, F, and G”; and (d) affixed eight copies of the real estate lease agreement under the name of the lessee of the above studio-gu building with the same content as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes, such as affixing seals prepared in advance.

2. On November 16, 2012, the Defendant: (a) submitted 8 copies of a forged real estate lease agreement to the lending officer H through I, as if it were a document duly formed by the applicant, to the public official in charge of the loan at the Yong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, 1247 Saemaul Undong, Busan-do; and (b) the Defendant exercised the said investigation document.

3. On November 16, 2012, the defrauded submitted a forged real estate lease agreement as in the preceding paragraph to the U.S. Saemaul Bank of Korea, and the Defendant, even though the Defendant was 455,000,000 won to the tenants, by deceiving the victims as if it were to cause 128,00,000 won, and then by deceiving the victims as if it were to cause 128,00,000 won, and then by deceiving the victims to receive KRW 250,00,000 from the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. Application of all the Acts and subordinate statutes to forged documents, such as a complaint and real estate trading contract;

1. Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime in question, Article 231 of the Criminal Act (Counterfeit of each private document), Articles 234, 231 of the Criminal Act, and Article 231 of the Criminal Act (Exercise of each of the above investigation documents), respectively.