logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2018.10.12 2018고정24
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and B are the mother and the fraud relationship, and C is the gap between the defendant and society.

On April 19, 2017, the Defendant and B, and C had not entered into a real estate monthly rent contract with the victim D and the Defendant C regarding the building E E in Scheon-si, Sacheon-si, but offered a loan to the lending company by using the lease business entity on the basis of the monthly rent contract (guarantee money of KRW 15 million, monthly rent of KRW 450,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 4500,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 300,000,000,000 for the lessor and lessee and the monthly rent contract of KRW 30,000,000,000,000 for the forged real estate rent contract.

A. On May 10, 2017, in collusion with the Defendant of a private document forgery and B and C, without authority to obtain a loan from a lending company without authority, even though there was no delegation or consent of the victim D at the I Authorized brokerage office located in Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, and with a view to exercising the right and duty to obtain a loan from a lending company, a lessor D, lessee C, deposit amount of KRW 30 million, and a monthly rent contract for real estate transaction in Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, E-si, 300,000 won for monthly rent.

B. On May 10, 2017, the Defendant and B, and C in collusion with the said investigation document holding the real estate monthly rent contract forged in the preceding paragraph “A” was held to receive a loan from the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., K, L, and the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd.

(c)

On May 10, 2017, the Defendant and B, and C acquired each of the above money through a total of four occasions, including: (a) a loan of KRW 12 million from the Defendant’s N account in the name of the K-A-B-B-B-B-B-B-C-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-C-

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A copy of lease agreement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on account transactions;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 30 (Counterfeit of Private Document), Articles 234, 231, and 30 (Uttering of Document) of the Criminal Act, Articles 347(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively.

arrow