logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.22 2017나41858
손해배상(자)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against A, which orders additional payment, shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. The calculation table of the amount of damages in the part of the first instance judgment shall be replaced by the number of pages 6 of the said judgment.

On the third side of the judgment of the first instance court, the "vehicle" shall be changed into "vehicle (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff vehicle")".

On the third 17th 10th 10th 1st 3th 201, this Court shall be applied to "the first 1st 3th 2th 2th

The fourth page 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be written with the phrase “to attend” (see Supreme Court Decision 96Da27384 delivered on October 11, 1996).

The 5th to 17th of the judgment of the first instance court shall be followed as follows.

[1) Amount of inheritance: 248,673,824 won (i.e., 208,673,824 won for property damage) (i.e., 208,673,824 won for consolation money of 40,000 won) from the judgment of the first instance to the 5th 9th 21th 60,673,824 (i.e., 260,673,824 won for damages to Plaintiff A), (ii) 12,00,000 won for consolation money of 12,673,824 won for inheritance, and 200,000 won for damages for delay calculated from the 205th 20,000 won for 8,000,000 won for 25th 20,000 won for 305,000 won for 25th 25,000 won for damages to Plaintiff C and 25th 251, respectively for damages to the 25th 25th 31.31.

arrow