logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.26 2017나30698
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance ordering the plaintiff A to pay the following money in excess of the amount set forth below.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. The number of pages 4, 16, 17, and 5 of the decision of the court of first instance shall be exempted from the list.

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

Each “this case” of the Council shall be made by inserting all the “case” to “court.”

Each of the 4th, 17th, 18th, and 5th, written judgments of the first instance court shall be subject to both the " February 11, 2017" and " December 20, 2017."

The 18th sentence of the first instance court ruling "2. 10. 2. 10. 202" shall be applied to " December 19, 2023".

The calculation table of future medical expenses of the fifth higher portion of the judgment of the first instance shall be replaced by the following table:

The calculation table of the fifth of the judgment of the first instance shall be replaced by the following table.

The calculation table of opening costs at the bottom of the fifth level of the judgment of the first instance shall be replaced by the following table:

The second two pages of the judgment of the first instance court shall be "23,188,320 won" and "265,384,120 won."

No. 11 of the 6th judgment of the first instance court shall be written with "No. 11" in the form of "No. 11."

No. 6th of the judgment of the first instance court, the "this Court" shall be applied to the "First Instance".

From 6th to 7th of the first instance judgment, the first instance court's 6th of the 15th to 7th of the 19th of the 7th of the

“Therefore, the Defendant, therefore, as to the Plaintiff A’s property damage of KRW 250,59,699 (= KRW 205,599,699), KRW 45,000,000, and property damage of KRW 205,59,699, which is the date of the instant accident, shall dispute over the existence and scope of the Defendant’s performance obligation from August 30, 2014 to January 29, 2018; KRW 15% per annum under the Civil Act until January 29, 2018; KRW 45,00,000,000 from August 30, 2014 to the date of full payment; and KRW 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, which is reasonable for the Defendant to dispute over the existence and scope of the performance obligation from August 30, 2014 to April 25, 2017.

arrow