1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to pay below shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, this is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2.The "statement of calculation of damages" in Part VII of the first instance judgment shall be replaced by the following table:

In addition, in the last part of the fourth page of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the results of inquiry into the Korean Doctor Association of this Court shall not be accepted" shall be added.

In the fourth fourth sentence of the judgment of the first instance, "the results of the physical examination commissioned by the president of the Lare University Hospital of this court and the fact inquiry" shall be defined as "the results of the physical examination commissioned by the president of the Lare University Hospital of the first instance court and the results of fact inquiry."

Each of the 5th, 6, 7, and 9, and 10th, the first instance judgment shall be made as follows:

"No evidence has been submitted by the plaintiff to undergo the above operation by the date of the closing of argument in the trial, it shall be deemed to have been disbursed on October 26, 2016 on the day following the date of the closing of argument in the trial for the convenience of calculation." "7,500,000 won" in the 5th sentence of the first instance court, 18th "12,00,000 won."

Part 5, 20, and 21 of the judgment of the first instance court "the results of the physical examination by the head of the relevant Lare University Hospital and the fact-finding shall be based on "the results of the physical examination by the head of the relevant court of first instance and the results of fact-finding".

From 6th to 8th of the judgment of the first instance court, the following shall apply:

“F. If so, the Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff is liable to pay damages to KRW 74,941,157 (i.e., KRW 62,941,157, and KRW 68,751,083, which was cited in the first instance trial among them, are disputed as to the existence or scope of the Defendant’s obligation to pay damages from September 5, 2013, which is the date of the instant accident, until February 5, 2016, which is the date of the pronouncement of the first instance trial, by the first instance trial, 5% per annum as stipulated in the Civil Act and the first instance trial.