(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.03.30 2017고단1115

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.03.30 2017고단1115

강요

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the appointment authority that appoints the head of G, an affiliated organization under the direct control of the president of the FF, and the victim H was appointed from October 17, 201 to October 16, 2014 each year from October 16, 201 and served as the head of the above welfare center. The victim I was appointed from the Defendant and served as the head of the above welfare center from October 17, 2014 to October 16, 2015.

A. On October 11, 201, the Defendant forced the victim H to pay KRW 500,000 per month to the victim H as F support payments by notifying the victim H that he/she was employed as the head of G (a recontract every one year) at the F Office, an incorporated association located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan CityJ on October 1, 201. On the 17th of the same month, the Defendant demanded the victim to pay KRW 500,000 per month as support payments of the said federation and forced the victim to pay KRW 16,749,00 in total as support payments of the said federation if he/she did not comply with such demand by threatening the victim by means of intimidation that would cause unreasonable disadvantage in the course of appointment, post-employment (recontract) or service, and forced the victim to perform an act by forcing the said federation to pay KRW 16,749,000 in total as support payments, from November 30, 2011 to October 16, 2014.

B. Around October 2014, the Defendant forced the victim I to meet the F Office described in the preceding paragraph with respect to the appointment of the victim I and the head of the welfare center, and forced the victim to pay the victim the sum of KRW 5,500,000,000 as the support payments of the said Federation from the seven-story K Office at that time to the victim “if the victim is appointed as the head, the amount equal to 50,000,000 won shall be equal to the support payments of the said Federation)” and forced the victim to perform a non-obligatory act by threatening the victim by threateninging the victim in a way that would be at an unreasonable disadvantage in the course of appointment and subsequent re-employment (re-contract) or work, if the victim does not comply with the foregoing request.

2. It is a means of coercion or coercion.

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 2020.08.13 2019구합104463

-서울행정법원 2015.02.05 2014구합69310

-대법원 2012. 5. 24. 선고 2012두2399 판결

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.09.27 2017고정552

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.05.16 2018고단240