logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.09.27 2017고정552
명예훼손등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The facts charged were partially revised to the extent that it does not harm the identity of the facts charged and the defendant's right to defense.

The Defendant is a member of the Countermeasures Committee (hereinafter referred to as the "Countermeasures") for the resolution of gender discrimination and human rights violations of the C General Social Welfare Center (hereinafter referred to as the "C General Welfare Center").

1. The defendant was in charge of defamation victim D;

In order to resolve the non-contractual part after the expiration of the contract period of social workers E in the position of a contract who worked in the welfare center, one demonstration, etc., which is held twice a week in front of the G Social Welfare Center located in the F Social Welfare Center in which the victim currently worked as the head of the agency, and attached the letter to the PP west, which is accompanied by a photograph of the assembly at the top of the measure.

On February 24, 2016, the Defendant came to go through various forms of struggles to oppose discrimination in the world and to protect human rights.

Second, it should be prepared only because it has been pregnant.

It is essential that the contract should not be terminated because the contract is not in harmony with the organization of the contract-based social welfare workers that the society (including the welfare center), the social welfare party to the social welfare, the leader of the private party to the social welfare, and the social welfare worker who tried to solve the problem.

(b) It does not engage in any act of a malicious business owner, such as reconcilating to all media reports on the case of a welfare center in civil action (compensation) against defamation.

(hereinafter referred to as “influence”) along with the content of “influence of human rights violations”, is ineligible for the Director General of the G Welfare Center.

A notice of the photograph cited in the flaz's fark " shall not be dismissed for the reason that the victim did not have any violation of human rights or gender discrimination, nor did he/she be in harmony with the organization, and even though he/she exercised the right to file a lawsuit with the Press Arbitration Commission, he/she shall damage the reputation of the victim by pointing out false facts as he/she exercised monthly

arrow