A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

150 million won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

. The applicant.

Punishment of the crime

The defendants shall be the head of H in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the head of a church, the second standing chairperson of I, and the chairperson of the Jaryaryary work Association.

K, L, M, N, andO (hereinafter referred to as "K, etc.") embezzled F, which is a member of Q church in the Gu of Ansan-si, Ansan-si, as well as F, which is a pastor of a church in the light of April 201, for the purpose of embezzlement of KRW 1.5 billion of church funds.

“The details of the complaint were filed with the Round in accordance with the church law.”

The Defendant called F with the knowledge that K et al. filed a complaint against F by around May 2011 through S(S) and called F, “ himself is working in the Korean Modern Federation.”

After the introduction of "F", F was met at the Monopool Memorial Hall.

The Defendant “K et al. consulted on the details of the complaint filed with the Labor Union with the Korean Federation of Domins in Korea.”

The relevant materials shall be submitted to the author for liquor tax payment.

The term " was defined as "...."

On the other hand, when the case that K et al. filed a complaint in T media was published, F entered the case with U.S. motive for the new university and asked to request the defendant to smoothly resolve the dispute between Q church and Q church.

Around that time, the Defendant, a proxy of F, is running a missionary project by selling well in Africa, and he is willing to smoothly resolve the case by gathering well the new ideas that raised a complaint, such as K, etc. of the funds for missionary projects.

“ ......”

On July 15, 2011, the Defendant received the cash of KRW 150 million, which U received from F, in return for the arrangement of agreement, from the mutual infinite coffee shop located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, and written an agreement between F and K on the same day.

On July 25, 2011, the Round Court concluded the case of complaint against F on the grounds that the letter of agreement and the letter of withdrawal of complaint have been submitted.

No person, other than an attorney-at-law, may conduct arbitration or preparation of legal related documents in return for money.

The defendant, not an attorney-at-law, shall conduct an arbitration on the case of general legal affairs in return for money and valuables.