1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. From October 11, 2009 to January 31, 2012, the Plaintiff is a person who was in office as the head of the Korea Coast Guard and the head of the Korea Coast Guard Association (hereinafter “Defendant church”), a branch church affiliated with the Korea Coast Guard Association (hereinafter “instant religious order”), which is a branch church affiliated with the Korea Coast Guard Association in Gangdong-gu Seoul (hereinafter “instant religious order”), and the Korea Coast Guard and the Korea Coast Guard (hereinafter “Defendant Union”) association is an association affiliated with the instant religious order having jurisdiction over the Defendant church.

B. On October 11, 2011, the Defendant Union, the head of the Defendant church, and the E, and F, were in violation of the resolution passed at the 87th general assembly meeting of the instant religious order (the habitual complainants in the social court). G as the head of G spreads false facts and damages his honor, etc. (hereinafter “the instant religious order constitution”).

VI. On the ground that Article 3 of the Disciplinary Ordinance (hereinafter “The Disciplinary Ordinance”) was violated, the competent authorities submitted and received a complaint against each Plaintiff on the same ground as G to the head of Gu.

(hereinafter “each of the instant complaints”) C.

At the 45th Provisional Labor-Management Council held on December 8, 2011, the Defendant Union established a committee for investigation and treatment (hereinafter referred to as the “Investigation and Treatment Committee”) comprised of a pastor and a chief seven persons to handle each of the instant complaints, and decided to grant not only the administrative rights and the administrative rights and jurisdiction, but also the discretionary rights and jurisdiction. The Defendant Union decided to appoint the first wood officer as the chairperson, the J wood officer, the K wood officer, the L wood officer, the M log, the Nro, and the Nro and the head of O, respectively.

The Investigation and Handling Committee of this case held two meetings to investigate each of the complaint cases of this case.

The plaintiff did not attend the first meeting held on December 13, 2011, and was established according to the resolution of the first temporary union at the 45th general meeting of the religious order of this case and its establishment on December 14th.