1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. From October 11, 2009 to January 31, 2012, the Plaintiff is a person who was in office as the head of the Korea Culture and Arts Association of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D (hereinafter “Defendant church”), the branch church affiliated with the instant religious order, as the head of the Korea Culture and Arts Association of Korea (hereinafter “Defendant church”). The Korea Culture and Arts Association of Korea (hereinafter “Defendant Union”) is a member church of the instant religious order having jurisdiction over the Defendant church.

B. On October 11, 2011, the Defendant Union, the head of the Defendant church, and the E, and F, were in violation of the resolution passed at the 87th general assembly meeting of the instant religious order (the habitual complainants in the social court). G as the head of G spreads false facts and damages his honor, etc. (hereinafter “the instant religious order constitution”).

VI. On the ground that Article 3 of the Disciplinary Ordinance (hereinafter “The Disciplinary Ordinance”) was violated, the competent authorities submitted and received a complaint against each Plaintiff on the same ground as G to the head of Gu.

(hereinafter “each of the instant complaints”) C.

At the 45th Provisional Labor-Management Council held on December 8, 2011, the Defendant Union established a committee for investigation and treatment (hereinafter referred to as the “Investigation and Treatment Committee”) comprised of a pastor and a chief seven persons to handle each of the instant complaints, and decided to grant not only the administrative rights and the administrative rights and jurisdiction, but also the discretionary rights and jurisdiction. The Defendant Union decided to appoint the first wood officer as the chairperson, the J wood officer, the K wood officer, the L wood officer, the M log, the Nro, and the Nro and the head of O, respectively.

The Investigation and Handling Committee of this case held two meetings to investigate each of the complaint cases of this case.

The plaintiff does not attend the first meeting held on December 13, 2011, and on the 14th day of the same month, the resolution of the first temporary union at the meeting of the religious order of this case as well as the case established accordingly.